The non conformer's Canadian Weblog

November 7, 2008

What they often do call news is mere lies, spin doctors, not real facts

 

cbcnews

– Its is undeniable reality that most of Churches today, at least over half,  are still   often cultural, social  groups, not real Christian Churches, and that includes both the white and black, ethnic churches.

– Obama election shows deep racial divide in church or the deep theological divides? or what is accepted in one denomination can not be accepted in others. The liberal churches clearly voted for Obama.

As posted on the net.

Obama election shows deep racial or a religious divide in church supposedly says ” The Associated Press – NEW YORK (AP) – The barrier-crossing election of Barack Obama did little to bridge the deep racial divide in American churches. In fact, some clergy say it has only served to underscore their differences. While nonwhite Christians voted overwhelmingly for Obama, most white Christians backed John McCain, according to exit polls. The Rev. Al Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, the denomination’s flagship school, said white evangelicals backed McCain because of his opposition to abortion rights, not because of the race of either candidate. According to Associated Press exit polls, 34 percent of white Protestants voted for Obama, while 65 percent went with McCain. Obama won the overall Roman Catholic vote, but white Catholics backed McCain by a slim majority, 52 percent to 47 percent. Among white Christians, the racial gap was most pronounced with evangelicals: 74 percent backed McCain, 24 percent backed Obama. The pattern is not new and fits the larger trend of white voters overall, the majority of whom voted for McCain..” ignores the fact the white Christians  tend to be from the more traditional established Christian  churches.

– Religious  White  people’s  racial values was, is not the only issue for many of them now still not supporting Obama. Many white people still also had voted for Obama, and note this that many white people, rightfully or wrongfully,  oppose Obama’s socialism which they tend to  seem to see as as another form of communism too. Many religious persons still do see Obama rather rightfully as a non Christian

-Also the Black Christians and clearly wrongfully had supported their own  race over adequate religious values  for Obama’s reality of being a true Christian is still very much debatable. He supports drinking alcohol, gays, abortion and who knows what, and  he is the first political candidate to be addressed as an Anti Christ by many because  of his inadequate Christian beliefs, or  because he  is a non Christian?

Too many reporters are mere Bullies still

Bullying tendency wired in brain
BBC News –  An area of the brain associated with reward lit up in scans when aggressive boys watched a video of someone inflicting pain. Boys without a history of unusual aggression had no such response, the study in Biological Psychology found.
Pain May Be Pleasurable for Some Bullies ABC News
Bullies may get kick out of seeing others in pain Reuters
United Press International – World Science – Telegraph.co.uk
all 24 news articles »

Palin gone, anything but forgotten
San Francisco Chronicle –  GOP vice presidential candidate Gov. Sarah Palin returned home in defeat to Wasilla, Alaska, on Wednesday night – leaving behind eyebrow-raising tales about towel-clad appearances and internal campaign feuds.
More Dirt on Sarah Palin’s Fancy Duds Washington Post
Internal Battles Divided McCain and Palin Camps New York Times
Dallas Morning News – The Swamp – Tribune’s Washington Bureau – ABC News – Los Angeles Times
all 468 news articles »

The Liberal news media tends not to support family  values, and / or Christians  but still I was surprised how many unsubstantiated facts,   lies the liberal news media had and is still printing about Sarah Palin , for they do falsely present  lies, slander, gossip, distortions, even hate all showing  to many what they themselves merely still are really like,  immoral persons!

see also

http://postedat.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/the-faith-factor-2008-vs-2004-exit-polls/

http://canadatoday9.multiply.com/journal/item/4/HOW_TO_DEAL_WITH_MAJOR_COMPLAINTS

It is absurd also still to call a drug user, an alcoholic, an abortionist, a fornicator, or a divorcée as a real Christian now still also

Sarah Palin fires back at ‘jerks’ Los Angeles Times – The governor and her aides dispute claims about her foreign-policy knowledge and $150000-plus wardrobe. By Seema Mehta and Maeve Reston Alaska Gov.
Palin Denounces Her Critics as Cowardly ABC News
Palin Calls Criticism by McCain Aides ‘Cruel’ New York Times
Reuters – The Associated Press – Washington Post – The Weekly Standard
all 802 news articles »
 
Readers Respond: Bush and His Critics Wall Street Journal –  The reader response to “The Treatment of Bush Has Been a Disgrace” has been overwhelming. Here’s a selection from the thousands of comments submitted by Opinion Journal readers: Finally, someone with the guts to stand up for W. 
 

 

“”We worship an awesome God in the blue states,” Barack Obama declared during his 2004 Democratic convention keynote. Thunderous applause greeted that line, in part because Democrats felt frustrated that they’d been unfairly cast as a secular or even anti-religion party, and by the political dominance of religious conservatives.”

The Rise of the Religious Left. But clearly Obama still did not get the evangelical votes.

The Faith Factor 2008 vs. 2004 — Exit Polls

election god gap detail final.JPG

election attenders non attenders final.JPG

election by faith whites final third try.JPG

 

 

 

http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/ 

http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/obama-triumphs-will-be-first-black-us-president/

 

Ten Faith Factors for Election Night

1.How Many Obamagelicals Are There? – It might seem farfetched that a socialist-terror-lovin’-pro-abortion candidate like Obama could win any evangelical Christians but he’s been courting them fervently since he began his presidential run. The key the 40% of evangelicals who call themselves “moderate” or “liberal.” Point of reference: John Kerry won 21% of white evangelicals, Gore 18%. Bill Clinton in 1996 won 26%.    

 

2.  Will Palin Turn Out the “Religious Right”? — By picking Sarah Palin, John McCain gambled that she’d be able to rev up the evangelical “base.” Even as her popularity has fallen generally, evangelicals still love her (some even believing she was sent to battle the anti-Christ.) Assuming most conservative evangelicals vote for McCain, the second question is: how many will show up? Point of reference: white evangelicals accounted for 23% of the electorate in 2004.

3. Do Midwestern Evangelicals Split With Their Brethren? — Recent polls have showed Obama trailing badly among evangelicals in Florida and Colorado but doing quite well with them in Michigan, Ohio and

Pennsylvania. If he succeeds there, he may have tapped into regional differences in style, theology and politics and launch a new era in faith-and-politics punditry, in which we no longer talk about “the evangelical vote” as a geographically uniform phenomenon.4. Will Catholics Ignore Their Bishops? – The overall Catholic vote has gone with the popular vote winner every election since 1968. Catholic Bishops have been urging Catholic voters to vote for pro-life candidates but a majority of Catholic voters are now pro-choice so it remains to be seen what influence the church will have. (Obama is also winning with the 100-year-old-nuns bloc) Another factor in Obama’s favor: a higher percentage of the Catholic vote will be Latino this year. Last election, George W. Bush won the Catholic 52%-46%.

 

5. Can Obama Finally Bowl a Strike With Skeptical White Catholics? – During the primaries, Obama did poorly with white Catholics, often working class ethnics or their offspring. Remember his feeble attempt to curry favor through bowling? They tend to be culturally conservative and haven’t voted for a Democrat since 1996. On the other hand, they’re especially concerned about the economy this year, and Joe Biden has been trying to bond with them as a fellow “cultural Catholics.” Point of reference: In 2004, Bush won 56% of white Catholics, Kerry 43%.

6. Will Whitebread Protestants Back the Black Guy? – Recent polls show Democrats gaining with a group that had leaned Republican for most of the past few decades – Mainline Protestants. It appears that while Sarah Palin energized evangelicals, she may have alienated some Mainliners. In 2004, they went for President George W. Bush 54%-46%.

7. Will Latino Protestants Vote Their Values or the Pocketbook? – One positive trend for Obama will likely be the shift of Latinos from the Republican side, where they resided in 2004, to the Democrats. The hidden religious story: most of the shift is driven by Latino Protestants. Many are evangelical and liked Bush’s Christian faith and his conservative positions on social issues (gay marriage, abortion) but have shifted to Obama because of the economy and concerns about immigration.

8. How Will the Kinda-Sorta Religious Vote? – In recent elections, the most religious you were, the more likely you were to vote Republican. This is known as the God Gap, which will still certainly exist. But watch for two things: among weekly churchoers how big is McCain’s margin? Bush won that group 61%-39% Second, Kerry last time beat Bush among more occasional churchgoers 53%-47%. Will Obama increase that margin?

9. Will Jews Schlep to Republican Side? – This only really matters in

Florida, and even there it doesn’t matter as much as you’d think (Jews made up 5% of the electorate there in 2004). Early polls had Obama struggling among Jews – in part because of fears about his former church’s connections to Louis Farrakhan — but more recently he’s caught up, possibly because Jews fear that Sarah Palin is an extreme evangelical. Or possibly the Sarah Silverman factor. Jews reportedly went about 75%-25% for Kerry.10. Will the GOP Become the ROP? – Will Republicans become the Religiously Oriented Party? In 2004, white evangelicals made up 36% of Bush voters.
Will that go up or down? If it becomes an even more dominant force within the party, how will that shape either the way McCain governs if he wins or, if he loses, how the Republicans re-invent themselves.

Carla Hinton  Religion Editor http://blog.newsok.com/religionandvalues/2008/10/31/389

so what do you say  about the faith factor…

Though the economy clearly was the defining issue of the election, Obama forged a new coalition by luring millions of religious left voters who had avoided Democrats in recent years.

In short:

He narrowed the God Gap. Bush beat Kerry among weekly church-goers by 61%-39%. McCain is beating Obama 54%-44% Most of that gain appears to have come from Protestants rather than Catholics

 

He won Catholics back. Early exit polls indicate he won 54% of the Catholic vote compared to 45% for John McCain. George W. Bush won the Catholic vote 52%-46%. Most of those gains came from Catholics who don’t attend mass weekly.

He also improved among white Catholics, according to the early exit polls. Bush got 56%-43% As of now, McCain lead by just 51%-49% This was despite an aggressive push by more than 50 Bishops to encourage Catholics to focus on abortion as the central issue.

He man real gainst among Evangelicals. Evangelicals and Born Again Christians made up a greater portion of the electorate this year than last election but that didn’t all accrue to McCain’s benefit, as predict. Obama improved slightly on a national level, getting 25% compared to Kerry’s 21%

But far more important, he made significant progress in the pivotal rustbelt states that won him the election. For instance, evangelicals flooded the polls in Ohio and Obama significantly improved on Kerry’s showing.

He attracted more Mainline Protestants – Though shifting toward the center in recent years, mainline Protestants — once a core of the Republican party — – still went for the Republicans in 2004. The exit polls didn’t ask specifically about mainline Protestants but it appears Obama improved slightly with this group..

He energized the lightly religious. Though secular voters already voted Democratic, they did so by an even bigger margin this year. Even more important, a quarter of the electorate says they go to worship services but only a few times a year. Kerry won that group with 54%-45%. Obama won 61%-38%

BREAKING: Catholic Shift to Obama

The rap on Obama during the primaries was that he couldn’t win because he struggled with Catholics. Apparently, he got past that. Early exit polls indicate he won 54% of the Catholic vote compared to 45% for John McCain….

Obama Luring Rest Belt Evangelicals But Not Southerners

Obama seems to have made far more progress with Born Again Christians in rust belt states than in the South. Based on preliminary exit polls: Florida: 78%-20% (McCain-Obama) Virginia: 78%-21% Ohio: 70%-29% Indiana: 66%-32%

BREAKING: Weekly Churchgoers vs. Occasionals

One thing that puzzles me about these numbers: Obama’s progress among Catholics is with those who don’t attend mass weekly. But among Protestants, he improved among those who do attend weekly. One possible theory: abortion. Mass-attending Catholics are more likely…

August 2, 2008

Bell moves to limit internet competitors, ISPs

 Because even many managers in Canada, the government too  are not honest, do not tell the truth, they often also do lie as to the actual reasons their product prices are going up, and/or the quality of their services are going down, thus they are still helping to put themselves out of work, out of business eventually and to be rightfully dismissed too.

 Bell_Logo_2
 
“Internet Content overload suggests need to rethink how the Web works” ? ha ha ha that is a really good joke.. Because to get the customers Bell initially had said it had the largest, fastest high speed system in Canada.. But Bell also next to cover up their clear inability to be efficient, to cover their poor management losses Bell next undeniably even  lies to the same customers as to the initial reasons they next were not able to deliver what they had promised, and Bell  next tries to justify their false pricing gouges.. Bell itself and it’s poor managers are  still a really good big joke. Who are they fooling now but themselves as to how bad managers they really are..

Because undeniably Bell Sympatico on it’s own cannot deliver effective, competitive internet services it next tries to stop anyone else who can.. knowing   how really useless the Prime Minister, Jim Prentice MP, Conservative federal minster of Industry and the CRTC are now too

   Bell moves to limit internet downloads of competitor ISPs  CBC.ca –   ” CBC News Bell moved in April to eliminate mandated access to its network by small internet service providers. (Paul Chiasson/Canadian Press) Bell Canada Inc. is moving to impose download limits on customers of independent internet providers,The limits would range from two gigabytes per month for customers with slower connections of 512 kilobits per second up to 60 GB for those with the faster speeds of five megabits per second, according to Acanac president Paul Louro. Customers who exceed those limits would incur extra charges, much like cellphone subscribers do when they surpass their monthly minutes.   Bell officials could not be reached for comment.  

The company has taken several steps toward eliminating the smaller ISPs’ ability to compete over the past few months, the firms say. Bell began slowing the speeds of its own Sympatico subscribers using peer-to-peer applications such as BitTorrent last November, then extended the practice to its wholesale customers in March, prompting a dispute that is before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.

The smaller companies, through the Canadian Association of Internet Providers, say Bell is breaking telecommunications law through its speed “throttling” and have asked the CRTC to force an end to the practice. CAIP has also said Bell is forcing the throttling onto its members so that they aren’t able to offer a competitive advantage, or faster speeds, than Sympatico. 

Bell also has an appeal before the Federal Court of Canada to scrap CRTC-mandated access of wholesale customers such as TekSavvy, Eagle.ca and Acanac to its network. Bell says the high-speed internet market is highly competitive and regulated rules of access are therefore no longer necessary.

Smaller ISPs were given access to the networks of phone companies in the first place because the incumbents held a natural infrastructure monopoly, which was initially built through taxpayer funds when they were government-owned.

Louro, posting on DSLreports.com, said the only good news for customers is that the download limits — if they are imposed in January, as proposed by Bell — will not affect current clients. So long as customers do not switch ISPs, they will continue to have unlimited downloading.

He also said Acanac is exploring the possibility of allying with other small ISPs to install its own equipment in Bell’s communications offices, which would allow them to bypass Bell’s forced download limits.

“We prefer not to do this alone,” Louro wrote.

Installing equipment in Bell’s buildings is a risky proposition, Gaudreault said, until the outcome of the company’s court appeal is known.

“The question then becomes, what next?” he said.”

   
Now Bell Canada wants to throttle ISP clients p2pnet.net
How to keep the Net free The Gazette (Montreal)
all 4 news articles »

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=bell+sympatico+thenonconformer&spell=1 

Related

FCC Blasts Comcast For Blocking Internet – Details Comcast’s conflict of interest! Read it here in the FCC press release!

FCC Lambasts Comcast For Blocking P2P Traffic, But Doesn’t Issue Fine – washingtonpost.com

The FCC lambasted Comcast ( NSDQ: CMCSA) for blocking traffic from some P2P users and evading its official position on the matter in a long awaited and 3-2 split ruling today. Prompted by a complaint filed by Free Press and Public Knowledge and complaints from Comcast subscribers who noticed problems using P2P applications such at BitTorrent, Comcast denied responsibility at first and then changed its story at least three more times as new details emerged. “Comcast’s interference is far more invasive and widespread than the company first conceded,” the commission wrote in its ruling. The FCC didn’t fine Comcast but ordered it to cease all “discriminatory network-management practices” by the end of the year. Within 30 days, Comcast is required to disclose its practices to the agency. Release (pdf).  Comcast has an anti-competitive motive to interfere with customers’ use of peer-to-peer applications,” which can deliver high-quality video content that users might otherwise pay for on cable TV. Calling Comcast’s tactics “invasive” and having “significant effects,” the commission wrote that it found the company is “monitoring customers’ connections using deep packet inspection and then determines how it will route some connections based not on their destinations but on their contents. In essence, Comcast opens its customers’ mail because it wants to deliver mail not based on the address on the envelope but on the type of letter contained therein.” The FCC believes Comcast “interfered with up to three-quarters of all peer-to-peer connections in certain communities.” The end result being the “blocking of internet traffic, which had the effect of substantially impeding consumers’ ability to access the content and to use the applications of their choice.” Still, the agency “reiterated that its interest is in protecting consumers’ access to lawful content. Blocking unlawful content such as child pornography or pirated music or video would be consistent with federal internet policy.”

 Comcast Illegally Interfered With Web File-Sharing Traffic, FCC Says

FCC Chair: Comcast Violated Open Access Rules

AT&T Ratchets Up Network Neutrality Debate In Letter To FCC 

https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/justifiable-uproar/

 and we thus all can see why too next… for those useless  Tories a

Tory majority still out of reach: Poll

” Published: Friday, August 01, 2008

OTTAWA – If Prime Minister Stephen Harper successfully goads Liberal Leader Stephane Dion into forcing a fall election, Harper may not be so pleased with the results.

A new poll shows the Conservatives just slightly ahead of the Liberals, but behind their Grit rivals in Ontario and Quebec, two provinces where the Conservatives must make gains if they hope to one day form a majority government.

Moreover, the poll, done exclusively for Canwest News Service and Global National by Ipsos Reid, shows that, despite Harper’s caustic dismissal of Dion’s green shift plan and his challenge in a speech Wednesday that Dion ought to “fish or cut bait,” voter support has barely moved.

If an election were held today, it would likely result in another Conservative minority.  ( Harper clearly desperately praying for a Miracle.. needs firstly to look equally after the good welfare of  all Canadains and  to start caring about what all of the citizens care about too.. not more money for himself and his bad  friends..)

If an election were held today, it would likely result in another Conservative minority.

The Ipsos Reid survey finds that 34 per cent of Canadians support Harper’s Conservatives, an improvement of one percentage point from the last Ipsos Reid poll six weeks ago, while Dion’s Liberals are sitting at 30 per cent, a drop of two percentage points.

If those results held through an election this fall, it would likely result in another Conservative minority but could, depending on where support is concentrated, produce a small Liberal minority government.”

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=abf4c3a4-9cdb-4f4e-9a52-796f0649a1be

https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/why-many-businesses-fail/https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/

July 18, 2008

Bell Sympatico executive Care Sasha Rollins

 
To:   Bell Sympatico executive Care Sasha Rollins
 
Bell Sympatico executive Care Sasha Rollins, CRTC, Jim Prentice MP,  even you all should have realized by now THAT HAD YOU PROPERLY DEALT WITH MY COMPLAINTS THE FIRST TIME, INSTEAD OF LYING TO ME, AMUSING, ABUSING ME, PRETENDING YOU HAD CARED, NEXT I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO MAIL YOU FIRSTLY THE 300 EMAIL LETTERS  OF MY COMPLAINTS NEXT..  Bell Sympatico Sasha Rollins  you should have also learned by now that taking a false Ostrich approach towards me, and my many rightful complaints about big bad bell Sympatico still does not make me go away.. nor my complaints too.
 
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/tag/bell/
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/CtznK287/bell.htm
http://witnessed.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/this-next-was-so-predictable-even-by-me-too/

https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com

http://canadatoday9.multiply.com/journal/item/4/HOW_TO_DEAL_WITH_MAJOR_COMPLAINTS

http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/dealing-effectively-with-computer-viruses/

http://thenonconformer.tripod.com/ 

  Attention the President of Bell Canada, Bell Sympatico.  (Prov 27:2 KJV)  Let another man praise thee, and not thine own mouth; a stranger, and not thine own lips.

Bell Sympatico undeniably clearly had beforehand promised me verbally a “high speed unlimited, uncapped, reliable, continual download services,  and not they will try to next to  offer me this, submit  their best service but they had, have  to deliver to my next what was promised.  In reality they had clearly failed to live up to their own advertisement, promises because of their in incapableness now to do so to me and often as I had witnessed even for 24 months and rightfully detailed, had complained to them too.  Bell, their false pride of self importance has gone to their head and has allowed also the employees, even the president of Bell, vice president of Bell Sympatico to wrongfully now be abusive to  me ,  to wrongfully think that they can dictate their  own contract obligations, terms now to others, to wrongfully make their own self evaluations too, and that the others, like me, have no choice but to comply even to their clearly lies, distortions, perversities. The Bell president himself now also needs to be reminded that a contract is a joint agreement amongst two equal, mutually submissive  parties, and that both parties have to respect the contract agreement, and each other, meaning definitely that Bell has to respect the customer now too.. When this immoral Bell perverts now even writes to me and says according to our own records we have adequately supplied your our services, that is a disserted one sided fact, not necessarily or rightfully shared by the customer now, me. I have dealt with another ISP and they were more honest as to what they had promised me and next delivered in comparisons to Bell Sympatico  now too. The Bell competitors  download speeds are significantly higher all the time as well,  with no capping too  and even cheaper too.
 
       
[…]   (Rom 8:28 KJV) And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. Bell Sympatico wrongfully had cut of my internet services last month June 1, 2008 cause they had wrongfully objected to my rightful complaints and me also going public about it world wide.. I next got a cheaper service at 1/5 the cost from Bell from another firm, that ironically still gives me the same service even from Bell that I had before.. so they Bell  had meant it for evil but it next had caused me to save loads of money instead.  http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/dirty-dirty-bell-sympatico/ […] 
.
From: Paul Kambulow
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 7:39 PM
Cc: billing@sympatico.ca  ;  Bell service ; DussaultMadeleine82 ; marketplace ; correspondenceminister ; letters@cbc.ca  ; news@ctv.ca   ; newsroom@herald.ca  ; newsdesk@lfpress.com  ; submit@theherald.canwest.com  ; letters@thegazette.canwest.com  ; localnews@tc.canwest.com  ; sunnewstips@png.canwest.com  ; city@thejournal.canwest.com  ; globalnews.reg@globaltv.ca  ; mmarshall@leaderpost.canwest.com  ; tabtips@png.canwest.com  ; sanderson@thecitizen.canwest.com  ; newsroom@canadianchristianity.com  ; ministre@finances.gouv.qc.ca  ; ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca  ; Letters@globeandmail.com
Subject: Bell Sympatcio executive Care Sasha Rollins
Ref: KMM75255I97L0KM, KMM16616921V25471L0KM , KMM16681313V70004L0KM 
 
When you do now write back to me please also do do include these related issues, topics now in full as well..  https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/tag/bell/
 
1- Why is it you Sasha Rollins wrongfully had never returned my phone calls to you this year in 2008, the last time we talked was before you went away for your Christmas holidays. This clearly was very unprofessional of you too. 
 
2- Why is it when you had agreed in December 2007 the 6 months free unlimited internet in 2008 to compensate that you Bell had previously lied to me and had next not only had not delivered my paid for high speed system the last two previous years, but now next you had undeniably not delivered it to me in 2008 . How stupid do you take me to me, what kind of a fool now? For even the next promised reliably or steady service, rather in 2008 it only worked well one week out of 4 weeks in every month of 2008 as I had detailed and I had in writing rightfully complained to you now too.. Bell, you should compensate me for the poor system you had delivered me previously and also now as well for 2008 and that was why I had asked a total compensation rightfully from you in 2008 for 2500 dollars as detailed to you in writing this year now too…
 
 3: I had asked of you many times for signed invoices for my monthly Sympatico billings for all of 2008 and I had not received it, finally you had sent on incomplete invoices, partials to me, and next you Bell you had refused to explain, deal with the clear unacceptable discrepancies on the monthly 2008 invoices that I had often by phone, in writing, on the net had detailed to bell Sympatico as well. Everyone at Bell Sympatico next had replied that no one had authorizations to deal with any of the items, only Sasha Rollins did, and he never got back to me on them ever, even to date too.. 
 
4: You Bell are also clearly guilty of forgery, lies, misleading, false business practices in that I HAD MANY TIME NOW HAD ASKED YOU FOR CONFIRMATION, PROOF THAT I HAD RENEWED THE SYMPATICO CONTRACT IN 2008 AND THAT I HAD REQUESTED ANY UPGRADES TO IT AND YOU DID NOT SUPPLY IT AT ALL. I IN 2008 WAS EVEN INITIALLY UNAWARE THERE WERE SYMPATICO CHANGES MADE, AND I WAS NOT TOLD BEFOREHAND, OR GIVEN THE PROOF THAT I HAD REQUESTED. I ALWAYS DO CONFIRM ALL AGREEMENTS WITH BELL SYMPATICO PREVIOUSLY IN WRITING BY EMAIL, AND YOU FORE SURE HAD NO SUCH LETTER FROM ME TOO.. I had rightfully as you are aware asked THE RCMP to investigate these matter in full too. if the contract was renewed by you NOW it should have been done at the old contract rates, and the promised 6 megs download speeds, and at the unlimited download as well. 
 
5: I had also rightfully complained din writing many times about your false capping of my downloads without my knowledge , prior approval as well of my downloads on the unlimited Sympatico download contract. Presently I have an unlimited download contract with one of your competitors but they rightfully they do not cap my downloads per our present contract to o. 
 
6: You Bell Sympatico had definitely many times now had unacceptably lied to me, had sent over 7 repairman to my home, had replaced my modem over 8 times as well, when you said that any of the problem of you failing to deliver me the reliable steady, continual high speed was related to me, my computer as well. I tested your system with 3 separate computers and operating system and it was your Bell line’s failure, Bells inadequate equipment, problems outside of my home that was the sole reasons of your own fault of past poor internet services to me. This all was also an unacceptable breach of the Sympatico contract towards me too. 
 
8: I HAD NEVER NOW FROM BELL SYMPATICO REQUESTED ANY MODEM UPGRADE AND NEXT IN 2008 YOU HAD FALSELY CHARGED ME EXTRA FOR THIS AS WELL. YOU BUNCH OF LYING CROOKS HERE TOO.  
 
9: Bell Sympatico you had tried to rob me of my monies now as well from my bank account in 2008 during the time I had been promised 6 month of Free internet services and those acts as well were, are totally despicable, immoral on your part too. 
 
10 I WANT YOU BELL STILL ALSO TO DEAL WITH THE FALSE INVASIONS OF MY PRIVACY BY THE POSTING OF MY PERSONAL INFORMATION ON THE SYMPATICO CUSTOMER’S FORUM, AND I WANT YOU ALSO TO DEAL WITH THE FALSE CENSORSHIPS OF ME, THE FALSE ATTEMPT TO DENY MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RIGHT TO BE HEARD ON THE SYMPATICO FORUM AND BY SASHA ROLLINS NOW AS WELL. NOW THAT IS JUST FOR A START.. DO STILL ALSO REFER TO ALL MY PREVIOUS 300 OF MY PAST EMAILS OF COMPLAINTS NOW TO YOU ABOUT BELL SYMPATICO’S TOO MANY OTHER UNACCEPTABLE INADEQUACIES, POOR SERVICES IN THE LAST 30 MONTHS TOO. EVEN THOSE POSTED ON THE NET FOR ALL TO READ NOW TOO.
 
THANK YOU, RSVP Paul Kambulow
   
From: paul kambulow
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 5:37 PM
To: billing@sympatico.ca Subject: 
Re: (KMM75255I97L0KM)
Is this all clear enough for you too or do I have to write more letters to you all, even on the net 
 
From: paul kambulow
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Bell executiveofficeCc: Bell service ; DussaultMadeleine82 ; marketplace ; correspondenceminister ; letters@cbc.ca  ; news@ctv.ca   ; newsroom@herald.ca  ; newsdesk@lfpress.com  ; submit@theherald.canwest.com  ; letters@thegazette.canwest.com  ; localnews@tc.canwest.com  ; sunnewstips@png.canwest.com  ; city@thejournal.canwest.com  ; globalnews.reg@globaltv.ca  ; mmarshall@leaderpost.canwest.com  ; tabtips@png.canwest.com  ; sanderson@thecitizen.canwest.com  ; newsroom@canadianchristianity.com  ; ministre@finances.gouv.qc.ca  ; ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca  ; Letters@globeandmail.com
Subject: Attention Bell Sympatico Executive Care Sasha Rollins and your stupid, absurd reply dated Jul 15 20081
 
My last 300 letters , WERE was addressed clearly to Bell Sympatico IN DETAIL now. what KIND OF CRAP DO YOU SEND ME AGAIN WHEN YOU DO NOT REFER TO MY VERY CLEAR SPECIFICS TOO NOW? I refer you to all of my 300 past email letters to Bell Sympatico in detail since Jan 2007 too. Do Bell deal with all of them adequately still . If you are still too incompetent to deal with them them have YOUR BOSS FIRE YOU AND GET RIGHTFULLY SOMEONE WHO CAN. The whole world reads my complaints and you and pretend. LIE RATHER when you say that you do not understand what I am COMPLAINING about ? I clearly had many times rightfully even complained that you Bell are dishonest, a clear liar, a twister of the facts ,truths , and that you Bell had also breached my contract, etc. all just for a start, and even much more. Do you need me to resend all the letters to you and to everyone again?RSVPDO YOU ALSO ABUSE ALL BELL SYMPATICO CUSTOMERS LIKE YOU HAVE UNDENIABLE ABUSED ME NOW TOO?

 

How can you be so EVEN stupid Bell Sympatico Sasha Rollins  now even  to threaten me now in writing today that if I continue to complain to others about Bell Sympatico, TO tell the truth about Bell that  you will  even cut of my internet service  ESPECIALLY  when firstly now  I  do not have any ISP service presently with Bell, I have no Bell Sympatico contract, and there is no bank access for you to get hold of too.. now do get it together at least.. before you write such stupid, foolish things to me..  and you should have also learned by now that taking a false Ostrich approach towards me, and my many rightful complaints about big bad bell Sympatico still does not make me go away.. nor my complaints too.

Attention Prime Minister of Canada the Honourable Stephen Harper PM, MP 

The Honourable Jim Prentice MP., Minister of Industry, Consumer affairs  July 19, 2008

My rightful complaints about clearly bad Bell Sympatico Canada have been mailed to you often, all the major news editors, and even to key members of parliament the last whole year, posted on the net too.. and you Prime Minister of Canada had now twice even backlogged them, but yet you did, still do nothing about this immoral Corporation, that is undeniably abusive, guilty of false, misleading practices, lies, and so forth as I myself have witnessed and detailed the last 18 months. And I can resend you all of the details if you had lost them, and I can also post   them all on   net again too.. and yes they are located presently as well over 30 internet sites.. Merely do a Google search of Kambulow, thenonconformer, Sympatico..

http://www.google.com/search?q=Kambulow%2C+thenonconformer%2C+Sympatico&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1

Now the sole person who presently is authorized to deal with me regardying all of this, is the uless, no good, lying, pretentious Bell executive care Sasha Rollins, wjho has mailed me very similar useless response to my 300 deailed emails to him firstly. Please do note even spoecically the lastest one too date july 15, 2008..

 1: He Sasha Rollins says my complaints have been taken seriously and my email has been increased to 5000 letters a day.. he clearly now lies, this same when when undeniably this same liar had falsely disconnected my Bell internet service on June 1 2008 and had not reconnected it, and I thus now have no Bell Sympatico internet services.. so my Bell emails do not work at all. I have another ISP supplier instead now. This show how seriously he takes my letters, does not do an adequate review of them now eve firstly.

 

2: He Sasha Rollins  lies and said he had promised me speeds up to 6 megs, that is like me fairly saying reciprocally I will pay him monthly up to 55 dollars per month as I see fit.. but up to contracts are illegal by the laws, courts  in the province of Quebec for they all  have to be of fixed, definable  values.
3: He Sasha Rollins   says he credit my account with 6 months free internet, but that was not what we had agreed upon, a false credit, where he next lied and charged me for more extras as detailed many times.
4: He Sasha Rollins  next  abuses me by referring to the city of LaSalle as being not responsible to return me any of the payments due to me, but  I have asked Bell in wrting to pay rightfully for their breach of my contract still too and many many many times.. and he even falsely had said he would not pay me..
5: He Sasha Rollins  quotes inappropriate regulations that are not sanctioned by the courts now too justifying his false invasion of my privacy, slander, abuse of me, his and Bell lies to me, their breaches my  contract, his false capping of my downloads as well.. he also in writing  stupidly even threatens to terminate my Bell Sympatico internet services when the same definite fool, idiot should know I do not even have one the last 2 months with Bell Sympatico.
He Sasha Rollins  said he took my complaints seriously.. what a liar he did not even address 99 percent of them firstly ..
and next  I rightfully also still expect your clearly useless Conservative Minister of Consumer affairs Jim Prentice MP to rightfully deal with it immediately too.
Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Ville LaSalle, Quebec h8n2c5 Tel 514-363-7316
Letter posted on the net too.

Do pass on this page also to others..

May 29, 2008

Net neutrality bill hits House

Amazing one of the most active complaint issues by the citizens on Canada’s interent and the major political parties in Canada  still have no comment? Why?

“The CRTC certainly shows no signs of protecting consumers, nor do the Conservatives and Liberals; they are much more likely to protect the interests of corporations when it comes to an issue such as this”..

Net neutrality bill hits House of Commons
CBC.ca – 14 hours ago
By Peter Nowak CBC News NDP digital spokesman Charlie Angus doesn’t believe the CRTC has all the tools it needs to prevent interference in the internet by service providers.
Net neutrality bill ‘about fairness to consumers’ p2pnet.net
Federal NDP To Introduce Net Neutrality Bill DigitalJournal.com
Metro Canada – Ottawa – IT World Canada Blogs – GigaOm – mediacaster
all 21 news articles »

Interesting to note that this issue gets no  attention from Canada’s MAJOR private media organizations. Why? They are clearly influenced by Bell? Compare this to ,,

Stand by your ex (or be hoist by your own Couillard) Globe and Mail –  What was he doing in Julie Couillard’s house so long after they had broken up? Why did he leave sensitive documents there?
all 1,393 news articles »
 

“Net neutrality bill hits House of Commons

The NDP has followed through with its promise to introduce legislation to the House of Commons that seeks to keep the internet open and free from control by service providers.

“This bill is about fairness to consumers,” said Charlie Angus, the NDP’s digital spokesman, in the House of Commons on Wednesday. “The internet is a critical piece of infrastructure not just for Canada but for the world … this bill protects the innovation agenda of Canada.”

The private member’s bill, C-552, is in reaction to moves by some of Canada’s largest internet service providers (ISPs), including Bell Canada Inc. and Rogers Communications Inc., to limit their customers’ uses of the internet. Bell, Rogers and a few others say a small percentage of customers have been congesting their networks by using peer-to-peer applications such as BitTorrent, so they have slowed the internet down at peak times of the day.

The ISPs’ actions have provoked outrage from internet users, with about 300 protesters taking to the steps of Parliament Hill on Tuesday. Critics have said the targeting of peer-to-peer applications is just the tip of the iceberg. If ISPs are allowed to decide which internet applications can and can’t be used, innovative new companies that were born from experimentation — such as Google, Amazon and eBay — may not happen in the future.

“Net neutrality affects everybody, every person, every business, every hospital, every institution is involved in the exchange of information over the internet,” Angus told CBCnews.ca. “This shouldn’t be about party lines.”

The four-page bill seeks to amend the Telecommunications Act and “prohibit network operators from engaging in network management practices that favour, degrade or prioritize any content, application or service transmitted over a broadband network based on its source, ownership or destination, subject to certain exceptions.”

It also looks to prohibit “network operators from preventing a user from attaching any device to their network and requires network operators to make information about the user’s access to the internet available to the user.”

The proposed bill makes exception for ISPs to manage traffic in reasonable cases, Angus said, such as providing stable speeds for applications such as gaming or video conferencing.

“There are areas where telecoms have to be able to exercise rights, but that doesn’t give them the ability to arbitrarily interfere or discriminate,” Angus said.

Section 27 (2) of the Telecommunications Act says: “No Canadian carrier shall, in relation to the provision of a telecommunications service or the charging of a rate for it, unjustly discriminate or give an undue or unreasonable preference toward any person, including itself, or subject any person to an undue or unreasonable disadvantage.”
 
The CRTC certainly shows no signs of protecting consumers, nor do the Conservatives and Libersls; they are much more likely to protect the interests of corporations when it comes to an issue such as this..

Officials at Bell and Rogers did not immediately return requests for comment.

A spokesperson for Minister of Industry Jim Prentice also did not immediately return a request for comment. The spokesperson also did not reply to requests for comment on the net neutrality rally.

Liberal industry critic Scott Brison has not weighed in on the issue, despite having held meetings with Bell, Rogers and several smaller ISPs a few weeks ago. His spokesman did not reply to a request for comment on Wednesday.

The CRTC can’t impose fines for companies violating the Telecommunications Act? Then what is the point of the act?

Section 36 also says: “Except where the commission approves otherwise, a Canadian carrier shall not control the content or influence the meaning or purpose of telecommunications carried by it for the public.”

Despite those two sections, Angus said CRTC chairman Konrad von Finckenstein told the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage two weeks ago that the regulator did not have sufficient means to punish ISPs violating the rules. Finckenstein said the CRTC needs the ability to impose monetary penalties for violating both the Telecommunications and Broadcasting Acts.

http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/05/28/tech-netbill.html
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/06/15/news-editors-canada/
 

April 28, 2008

Action, not mere words needed

  
 
What started as a simple phone call by me in January 2007 to Bell tech help line to determine why my internet services were so slow and sluggish next had  become a major farce, cover-up on the part of Bell Sympatico. I was next lied to for months as to the real reasons Bell they rather had offered me their poor internet services to me and  to many others in my city for years now too.. and then Bell had even  lied to me some more, had also breached their contractual obligations to me many times too, had allowed me even to be slandered, abused on the Bell customer forums now too.. and why? so  that clearly greedy Bell can continue stay in business to make more money..
 
and so who really cares now about the customer’s good welfare in reality? now? What not Bell itself, not the CRTC, not the federal government, not our Prime Minister Stephen Harper, not  the the federal Minister of Consumer Affairs, Jim Prentice..  not  any provincial consumer affairs Minister, but only the citizens, the news media, and the NDP party care about the citizens  good welfare really it seems. Not acceptable for sure too!
 
 
 
 “If you were half as good at running a company as you were at lobbying, maybe you’d have a better network,”  Quebecor executive vice-president Luc Lavoie who took a shot at the quality of Bell Canada’s cellphone service: . http://news.aol.ca/article/telecom-summit/258999/
   
 The future is wireless, some would say  and the  past way they have mismanaged their past land line, ISP services too,  clearly indicates they will do it also next with the wireless services too at the users, customers expenses…
  
Recent discussions by both Bell and Rogers on their Corporate need  to get more and more money, with even any excuse, still out of consumers, and to throttle the downloads,  only all clearly confirms the reality as to how poorly managed these same companies in reality are still.. They too now have been wrongfully over subsidized by the CRTC, the Canadian  federal governments now too… now it is rather time the citizens got the break, protection.
    
Reality- Dirty Dirty Bell Sympatico …the most abusive Corporation, firm I have dealt in Canada in my lifetime. Paul Kambulow
 
 Not acceptable, and Comments are not  needed  FOR THERE IS NO WAY TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH..

 

 
From:  pk
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic :::m=10675958:p=10146545
 
..now clearly useless LuvieDuvie:  thank you for your opinion but who had now made you the God, judge and jury of me now.. the devil?   judge me not and you will be not judged yourself.. firstly also take the big beam out of your own eyes and then you can help the others a lot better too..  for people like you who try to suck up to Bell rather still do not  help the matters for anyone.. for now Bell really rightfully needs a serious rod and not a carrot..
 
Me I had rightfully  witnessed how dirty Bell really is and I did something good about it.. I too had helped to exposé them to all for what they are really like  and rightfully too worldwide.. I told them what I was doing and why too beforehand even. Yes I do not show partiality to anyone bad cops, bad politicians, bad managers, bad pastors, bad corporations too and  I have been exposing them the last 3 decades.. for someone has to do it too.
 
I have been working with the News media, the press the last 25 years, and for a decade now too I daily write my views to all the major Newspapers, mostly in Canada, and they do next often act upon it as well. I also post my own comments on politics now too.  http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday6  https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/  The news media plays a vital role in our society, it tends to be the voice, the conscience of the majority of the people, citizens..  Yes I also do even complain about news reporters lies, spins, distortions but fortunately they have their free speech and so do many others too now, me included.. at least most of the time.. I have had the police wrongfully come to my home 6 times in my life time in Canada cause some politician did not like that I had sent him a letter with a copy to the news editors, including a prime minister, premier, mayor now too.. and I am still writing, and most of the bad guys I wrote about are out of office  sooner or later. For the news media tends not to support the losers once exposed even by me.. and no politician can win without the news media support, for advertising is very costly as even Mrs. Clinton or the  PM Stephen Harper knows. Bell relies on their adds, not the past satisfied customers for it’s business mostly still too.
 
Have a nice day Paul
 
http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/

Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:58 PM
To: PK
Subject: Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic :::m=10675958:p=10146545
 
Dear paul kambulow,  The thread “The Paul Kambulow Topic” in the forum titled “Miscellaneous” has received the following reply from LuvieDuvie: 

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic 

‘I want the whole world to see what they are really out and to have BELL GO OUT OF BUSINESS.. THAT SHOULD BE CLEAR EVEN TO YOU from THE START of my post on Bell’s site’ 

Well if your venomous motives wern’t clear before, you certainly made them clear now. 

Thanks, Have a nice day

From: PK
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:39 PM
To: Sympatico Discussion Forum
Subject: Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic :::m=10675958:p=10146545

 Like I wrote elsewhere here too

 I merely have substantiated here how many others now do also like me feel about Bell’s secrecy, under handiness, definite internet contract violations, lies… I support my side of the truth, story too.

I am not alone who complains to Bell often and loud.

and still what surprises me is that Bell wrongfully thought it could get away with al of their bad acts to me and others in the first place..

Me I have the decency to first complain to Bell, to tell them honestly, openly what I am going to post on my site next about them too, at least they were pre-warned by me.
but firstly you did notice that no one from Bell has send me a copy of my last six months billing or proof I had requested any contract changes, new equipment as well, and no one had phoned me back this week from Bell again now too.. now why was that? They had lied and had promised they would.

So it is no wonder so many people today are really rightfully upset at Bell, not just me.

Getting me more upset is the wrong thing for Bell to try to do, I just get louder, do write thousands more letters to news editors, electric officials still too..

They Bell should by now know I too can escalate the matters and not back down.. Bell still does needs to adequately deal with me, reply to me before it gets worse for them and they lose thousands more customers..
Beyond the shadow of the doubt the articles posted here by me showed that Bell ‘so capping reasons were false, unsubstantiated, and so I still rightfully object to Bell capping my net to all too.
I paid Bell for unlisted, unlimited download and they did not supply it to me, Bell did not even have the honestly to originally tell the truth to all and to beforehand say that they were capping it now as well.. Bell they done it first in secret, and were thus wrongfully violating my personal privacy in the process too.
Talking about Bell’s balance reply Bell they have only one reply basically and It is take it or leave it.. I have another.. I rightfully object!

but me I also do fight back and let the whole world know how the snakes in the dark operate in the darkness, and the darkness hates the light to be revealed upon it still too
Bell loses many many customers now too as a result of these exposures of how Bell operates.
Even my neighbors when they read the newspaper can see the positive influence that I have had on the elected officials, news media in regard to Bell’s undeniable bad services, bad acts and my neighbours they all agree with me on this too… I am doing a good thing exposing Bell.

In fact NDP Party did not make a public comment till I asked how come? and they immediately spoke out against Bell now too.
Have a nice day
Paul
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/

Bell should not fight with someone retired like me, for I have plenty of free time , and a desire to pursue it with everyone even more next too, and it will be costly for Bell too.
I told them beforehand in writing the war with Bell will escalate NEXT TOO and it did, it has, they have a lot more to lose

 

 

From: PK
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:21 AM
Subject: They still do like to lie, distort and bash me, others on Bell Sympatico customer forum and Bell, the Bell administrator falsely allows it to.. but Bell does not allow anyone to loudly complain about Bell, the immoral hypocrites
They often do  like to lie, distort, slander  and bash me, others on the Bell Sympatico customer forum and  Bell,  plus the  Bell administrator also now falsely allows it to.. While I use my real name, the main poster use an alias to disguise they are likely related to Bell’s executive Care Sasha Rollins..  http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/action/forums/displaypost?postID=10146557  It does Remind  me of the new Conservatives too. They can’t help showing to all what they are still really like, liars, bad persons..

Posted Apr 28, 2008 by LuvieDuvie
Well at least I (we) now know the reasons why Bell apperantly told him they would terminate his internet service…. can’t say I blame then now.

P: I don’t think you are gaining any allies as your abuse in, and of, this forum continues… Posted 12:02 AM by paul kambulow
OutStart Participate>>”Dear Client, Thank you for choosing Bell Sympatico Online Client Care. We have received your email and one of our representatives will reply to
you. A response will be sent to you within the next 24 to 48 hours. Your reference number for this email is 7720253.”  
I guess Birds of feathers flock together and thus maybe you are just as big a liar as Bell mostly still is for you cannot substantiate that Bell has said they would terminate my internet contract with Bell for in reality their rather bad internet services, for rather Bell has has even lately in writing now said to me that BELL STILL WANTS TO CONTINUE DOING BUSINESS WITH ME. SIGNED SASHA ROLLINS BELL EXECUTIVE CARE.
Thank you for your post anyway for it still gives me my free speech opportunity to write to all more about Big Bad Bell Sympatico, and how Bad Bell’s EXECUTIVE CARE SASHA ROLLINS AND HIS SUPERVISOR were, ARE IN BADLY INVOLVED IN ALL OF THIS abuse of me by BELL AGAIN TOO. Sasha has not denied my claim TO HIM IN WRITING TOO now of him likely being an accomplice Bell falsely by fraud tying to get me and many other BELL CUSTOMER’S of from our unlimited contract as some BELL’S SUBORDINATES had promised in January apparently to Bell’s Board of directors. YES I HAD OFTEN DETAILED BELLS MANY UNDENIABLE WRONG DOINGS WORLD WIDE IN WRITING TO ALL MANY TIMES even as to why they now are so Bad , for even the undeniable witness, public record. If Bell was not in the wrong do you now think they would have let all of my Bell writings drag on this long? of course not.. very revealing ehh?

Did you even now really think that I was writing here now at all to get any kind of support from anyone here, then you are still dreaming, and/or what you think this is some kind of election platform? popularity contest? Note Rather by fairness , by requirement of the law itself, I do have the duty to first present my complaints in writing to Bell Sympatico, to also detail my complaints to them, and also next to give them a chance to rectify them now, even before the matter can even be escalated to any of the courts, consumer affairs ministers, news media next too. This I have done. Thus had you read my posts here you could have noticed that I was just keeping this requirement of the law here too before the matter here too obviously has to be taken to court, by even Bell firstly now if they want to get paid, for they have already in writing admitted to me that I have pre charged them firstly with breach of contract, unethical, unprofessional behavior , harassment , obstruction of justice, fairness too, and many times in writing now, and Bell has, have not even denied it back to me and next they cannot by law, it is too late..
And so next I am rightfully now asking them to pay a compensation to me, and any others for all of this abuse now  too. I even have now specified the rightfully fair compensation demand from me for the whole world to know and read, at 1000 dollars and one year free high speed unlimited internet for their past false misleading adverting, poor services   to me, and for their undeniably not keeping now 3 past contractual agreements with me even those of August 2007, December 2007 too.
 
 Next this year  there were those lying crooks at Bell who to get a commission had definitely committed fraud / forgery and said I had requested from them both an  internet and equipment upgrade on my account, with no substantiation now to prove it too, even  like you,  and  I have reported this to the RCMP and asked them to deal with it too, and Bell has not even denied any of I toot, because Bell Sympatico Billing had confirmed these facts already this month  to me,  and gave me one of their names too, and so  I asked Bell to also prosecute those bad Bell people too still.  Why you think it was accidently that Bell had wrongfully refused to give me an official copy signed too, in writing the last four months Billing statement?  the direct proof of this fraud so I can likely also  present it too the judges formally too? Not so? Dream on..  for the reality bites ehh?
 
And what you do not think that many people who had, have read all these facts already, even  posted on over 30 different internet sites for months now too, posts read by hundreds of thousands of people world wide, that  next Bell has not lost many customers as a result too? Dream on!
 
but do have a nice day, Thanks for the post
Paul
http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/
 
What you can do : Complain  for a start to CRTC »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/welcome.htm ,
Competition Bureau »www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/epic···/en/Home ,   
     
Complain to the News media
the Local MP’s, the premiers of all provinces:

 

From: PK
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:21 AM
Subject: They still do like to lie, distort and bash me, others on Bell Sympatico customer forum and Bell, the Bell administrator falsely allows it to.. but Bell does not allow anyone to loudly complain about Bell, the immoral hypocrites
They often do  like to lie, distort, slander  and bash me, others on the Bell Sympatico customer forum and  Bell,  plus the  Bell administrator also now falsely allows it to.. While I use my real name, the main poster use an alias to disguise they are likely related to Bell’s executive Care Sasha Rollins..  http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/action/forums/displaypost?postID=10146557  It does Remind  me of the new Conservatives too. They can’t help showing to all what they are still really like, liars, bad persons..

Posted Apr 28, 2008 by LuvieDuvie
Well at least I (we) now know the reasons why Bell apperantly told him they would terminate his internet service…. can’t say I blame then now.

P: I don’t think you are gaining any allies as your abuse in, and of, this forum continues… Posted 12:02 AM by paul kambulow
OutStart Participate>>”Dear Client, Thank you for choosing Bell Sympatico Online Client Care. We have received your email and one of our representatives will reply to
you. A response will be sent to you within the next 24 to 48 hours. Your reference number for this email is 7720253.”  
I guess Birds of feathers flock together and thus maybe you are just as big a liar as Bell mostly still is for you cannot substantiate that Bell has said they would terminate my internet contract with Bell for in reality their rather bad internet services, for rather Bell has has even lately in writing now said to me that BELL STILL WANTS TO CONTINUE DOING BUSINESS WITH ME. SIGNED SASHA ROLLINS BELL EXECUTIVE CARE.
Thank you for your post anyway for it still gives me my free speech opportunity to write to all more about Big Bad Bell Sympatico, and how Bad Bell’s EXECUTIVE CARE SASHA ROLLINS AND HIS SUPERVISOR were, ARE IN BADLY INVOLVED IN ALL OF THIS abuse of me by BELL AGAIN TOO. Sasha has not denied my claim TO HIM IN WRITING TOO now of him likely being an accomplice Bell falsely by fraud tying to get me and many other BELL CUSTOMER’S of from our unlimited contract as some BELL’S SUBORDINATES had promised in January apparently to Bell’s Board of directors. YES I HAD OFTEN DETAILED BELLS MANY UNDENIABLE WRONG DOINGS WORLD WIDE IN WRITING TO ALL MANY TIMES even as to why they now are so Bad , for even the undeniable witness, public record. If Bell was not in the wrong do you now think they would have let all of my Bell writings drag on this long? of course not.. very revealing ehh?

Did you even now really think that I was writing here now at all to get any kind of support from anyone here, then you are still dreaming, and/or what you think this is some kind of election platform? popularity contest? Note Rather by fairness , by requirement of the law itself, I do have the duty to first present my complaints in writing to Bell Sympatico, to also detail my complaints to them, and also next to give them a chance to rectify them now, even before the matter can even be escalated to any of the courts, consumer affairs ministers, news media next too. This I have done. Thus had you read my posts here you could have noticed that I was just keeping this requirement of the law here too before the matter here too obviously has to be taken to court, by even Bell firstly now if they want to get paid, for they have already in writing admitted to me that I have pre charged them firstly with breach of contract, unethical, unprofessional behavior , harassment , obstruction of justice, fairness too, and many times in writing now, and Bell has, have not even denied it back to me and next they cannot by law, it is too late..
And so next I am rightfully now asking them to pay a compensation to me, and any others for all of this abuse now  too. I even have now specified the rightfully fair compensation demand from me for the whole world to know and read, at 1000 dollars and one year free high speed unlimited internet for their past false misleading adverting, poor services   to me, and for their undeniably not keeping now 3 past contractual agreements with me even those of August 2007, December 2007 too.
 
 Next this year  there were those lying crooks at Bell who to get a commission had definitely committed fraud / forgery and said I had requested from them both an  internet and equipment upgrade on my account, with no substantiation now to prove it too, even  like you,  and  I have reported this to the RCMP and asked them to deal with it too, and Bell has not even denied any of I toot, because Bell Sympatico Billing had confirmed these facts already this month  to me,  and gave me one of their names too, and so  I asked Bell to also prosecute those bad Bell people too still.  Why you think it was accidently that Bell had wrongfully refused to give me an official copy signed too, in writing the last four months Billing statement?  the direct proof of this fraud so I can likely also  present it too the judges formally too? Not so? Dream on..  for the reality bites ehh?
 
And what you do not think that many people who had, have read all these facts already, even  posted on over 30 different internet sites for months now too, posts read by hundreds of thousands of people world wide, that  next Bell has not lost many customers as a result too? Dream on!
 
but do have a nice day, Thanks for the post
Paul
http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/
 
What you can do : Complain  for a start to CRTC »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/welcome.htm ,
Competition Bureau »www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/epic···/en/Home ,   
     
Complain to the News media
the Local MP’s, the premiers of all provinces:

do see also
 https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/to-bell-sympatico/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/unfair/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/bell-internet/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/why-many-businesses-fail/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/buyer-beware-beware/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/crtc-farcical-hearings-on-internet-speed-control/
http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/bell-bce-sympatico/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/is-your-isp-still-even-watching-you/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/the-war-against-bell/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/bell-throttles-internet-speeds/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/and/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/consumers-affairs/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/bell-lied/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/i-cannot-trust-you-for-you-lie-to-me-all-the-time/
 https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/deceptive-unacceptable-unfair-business-trade-practices-unreliable-internet-access/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/basic-contract-law/
http://witnessed.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/this-next-was-so-predictable-even-by-me-too/
 https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/action-not-mere-words-needed/

 

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.