The non conformer's Canadian Weblog

January 27, 2015

free speech, inappropriate speech, hate speech and censorship

free speech
 .
There is difference between free speech, inappropriate speech, hate speech and censorship, unlawful use of authority, as we all can tend to know the Cops, Politicians, Pastors, Crooks, Muslims, Jews, Hindus etc. tend  too  like to censor falsely any speech that is negative about their acts, behavior, lies. Yes many persons falsely seek to demonize those with whom they disagree.
 .
Some recent legislation has targeted at the so-called “hate speech.” Seeking to relieve certain groups from psychological distress resulting from discriminatory communication, these laws limit the extent to which derogatory statements can be made regarding differences of race, sex, and religion, but just because I state some basic truths about specific groups and they falsely do not want to hear it, admit, have it known does not make my remarks a hate speech.
 .
Sadly the  Gays, Jews,  Muslims, and some others tend to define any negative criticisms of their behavior falsely as hate speech.
.
jLkgar
.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the world’s major sources of instability.
1- Israel currently has 262 Jewish-only settlements and ‘outposts’ built on confiscated Palestinian land. Palestinians do not have any settlements on Israeli land.
2- The Israeli unemployment rate is 5.8%, while the Palestinian unemployment in the West Bank is 22.5% and 41% in Gaza.
3- 133 Israeli children have been killed by Palestinians and 2,060 Palestinian children have been killed by Israelis since September 29, 2000
4 -1,195 Israelis and at least 9,826 Palestinians have been killed since September 29, 2000.
5- 11,018 Israelis and 71,841 Palestinians have been injured since September 29, 2000.
6 – During Fiscal Year 2014, the U.S. is providing Israel with at least $8.5 million per day in military aid and $0 in military aid to the Palestinians.
7 – Israel has been targeted by at least 77 UN resolutions and the Palestinians have been targeted by 1
8 – 0 Israelis are being held prisoner by Palestinians, while 6,500 Palestinians are currently imprisoned by Israel.
9- 0 Israeli homes have been demolished by Palestinians and at least 28,000 Palestinian homes have been demolished by Israel since 1967
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
.
anti-semitism 4
.
Freedom of religion does not apply to Islam, cause it is a cult, it demands blind loyalty, obedience to it’s false teachings. The dividing line between extremism and civility, authoritarianism and democracy, today is increasingly drawn along this line: For lack of any coherent ideologies, many of today’s extremists are fuelled on pure demand for silent adulation and blind faith.   https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/should-we-deport-all-muslims-from-canada/
.
Hate speech2
.

Criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic.

https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2010/11/12/criticism-of-israel-is-not-anti-semitic/

.

FALSELY ACCORDING TO THE LYING JEWS THERE IS NO RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH IF YOU TELL A NEGaTIVE TRUTH ABOUT THE JEWS, Israel?  Hate speech today often  means anything the Jews firstly  hate to hear, especially the truth about themselves..
.
Now there is no such thing as free speech in the sense of unlimited speech.  Free speech is simply a useful term to focus the  attention on a particular form of appropriate  human interaction and the phrase is not meant to suggest that all speech should never be interfered with appropriately.
.
Still we have no fundamental human right not to be offended in public discourse .  The laws did not protect the dignity of the white supremacist deeply offended by the message of racial equality and de-segregation advocated by the civil rights movement in 1960s or the  Jews being exposed for abusing the  Palestinians, or Muslims falsely  forcing their faith falsely on others.
.
Freedom of speech and the right to be heard as well should be the rights of all of the citizens;  on the other hand, this freedom nor it; suppression  is not an absolute as  some persons falsely think that it is.  Some forms of speech are rightfully  thoroughly to be outlawed  such as lying, fraudulent advertising, child pornography, obscenity, fighting words, slander, help-wanted ads that discriminate on the basis of race, words used in a criminal transaction, unlicensed broadcasts, libel, speech that infringes a copyright, and unauthorized disclosure of some data .   Governments may regulate, or censor speech if it  a viable public concern, or threatens national safety.
.
Dealing with supposedly Hate speech alone  are ineffective; they simply do not work, as the  simultaneously do not address the central motives that drive hate speech. More valid action is required here. Some advocates of more hate speech codes, due to the reality the emotional pains that some  speech sometimes causes, are willing to risk denying citizens of rights in order to spare the objective individuals from psychological discomfort . Neglects the basic reason  that the specific  minority groups and those wanting hate speech codes ultimately hope to gain: a false  actual “change in public opinion”, not a “change of heart” in which individuals forcefully  suppress,  give up their rightful views. This is still a false denial of  someone’s rights to speak and to be hard. It doesn’t matter what sensitivities were hurt. It doesn’t matter what deity, religion, or prophet was lampooned. No one has the right to take someone else’s life just because their feelings were hurt.
.
There has been and will always be differences between people. The solution to cutting remarks and emotionally charged communication is not to merely limit the thoughts and opinions a person can express. A person should be allowed express their opinions in a non-violent matter. If a person acts unlawfully also  in doing so, that person should be punished, using existing generic codes, because of his/her literal actions, not thoughts or opinions. At the same time, minority groups can  use that same freedom of speech to peaceably educate the  others, the public and work on the root of the problem, and in doing so effect a voluntary change in public opinion.
.

There is inappropriate speech..   The Islamic massacre at the offices of Charlie Hebdo was, of course, an attack on free speech. It has inspired worldwide support for freedom of speech.   In the aftermath of what happened at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris there were a limited, but noticeable, number of political comments bordering on defending  the murders. The comments didn’t go as far as saying the people deserved to be killed but people tried to excuse what happened. Including some Catholic leaders. Their comments were  inappropriate speech. ” I’m not really sure what more evidence they need. Muslims attacked and killed people working for a satirical newspaper well known for lampooning Muhammad and Islam (as well as other religions and religious figures). The gunmen were Muslims. They were heard shouting “We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad” and “God is Great” in Arabic (“Allahu Akbar”). This was a religion inspired attack by religious people for religious reasons. Sharia calls for death for Blasphemy. The gunmen, despite having no authority to do so, were enforcing this law. A religion was insulted. A religion was defended by religious people and it was done with murderous consequences.” To suggest Islam had nothing to do with it is the height of either stupidity, naivete or immorality. Clearly the Sharia law needs to be banned, prohibited as well..  There *is* an issue within Islam and that issue is that Sharia law says that blasphemy is punishable by death. all persons  need to put pressure on Islamic leaders to renounce this law and demand that the Islamic leaders declare that Islam also *is* open to criticism and satire. According to the data from an American survey published here

  • 58% said “no” When asked, “Do you believe that criticism of Islam or Muhammad should be permitted under the Constitution’s First Amendment?”
  • 45% of respondents agreed “…that those who criticize or parody Islam in the U.S. should face criminal charges,”
  • 32% believed “…Sharia law should be the supreme law of the land in the US.”
The more these people accept that Islam is not above criticism, they more they accept that blasphemy is *not* punishable, and the more vocal they are about that to their community leaders, the less likely it is that people will be killed for drawing cartoons.
 .
Do see
https://witnessed.wordpress.com/2014/11/21/about-the-persons-who-cannot-see-the-truth/
https://postedat.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/i-am-a-slave-to-no-man/
https://www.google.ca/search?q=thenonconformer+free+speech

.
Micah 7:6 For the son dishonoureth the father, the daughter riseth up against her mother, the daughter in law against her mother in law; a man’s enemies are the men of his own house.

.

Philippians 3: 18 (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ:

.

James 3:
1 My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.
2 For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body.
3 Behold, we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body.
4 Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth.
5 Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!
6 And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.
7 For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind:
8 But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.
9 Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.
10 Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be.
11 Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?
12 Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.
13 Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom.
14 But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.
15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.
16 For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.
17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.
18 And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.

.

April 28, 2008

Bell’s latest response

 For decades I have rightfuly  not changed my views about big bad Bell.. Paul Kambulow

.

 “If you were half as good at running a company as you were at lobbying, maybe you’d have a better network,”  Quebecor executive vice-president Luc Lavoie who took a shot at the quality of Bell Canada’s cellphone service: . http://news.aol.ca/article/telecom-summit/258999/
.
 The future is wireless, some would say  and the  past way they have mismanaged their past land line, ISP services too,  clearly indicates they will do it also next with the wireless services too at the users, customers expenses…

.

Recent discussions by both Bell and Rogers on their Corporate need  to get more and more money, with even any excuse, still out of consumers, and to throttle the downloads,  only all clearly confirms the reality as to how poorly managed these same companies in reality are still.. They too now have been wrongfully over subsidized by the CRTC, the Canadian  federal governments now too… now it is rather time the citizens got the break, protection.

.
Reality- Dirty Dirty Bell Sympatico …the most abusive Corporation, firm I have dealt in Canada in my lifetime . Not acceptable, and Comments are not  needed  FOR THERE IS NO WAY TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH..
.

I lived in Canada most of my life, I went to school, church, university, courts, hospitals there now too,  and I also worked only in Canada.  So I am truly Canadian. I am now retired but I do still purse my favorite pass time, writing on subjects like free speech, religion, governments, politics, and crooks such as even the bad RCMP too. I am transparent and fully  honest now too. Even if the bad guys do not like it. I do like to write about Christianity Truth, Freedom, Free speech, regulations, Transparency, Accountability, the government and the laws, Law and order with real justice, and gun control now as well.  

.

I am retired and I have a civil engineering degree, Concordia University , Montreal 1968, and I had worked as a Remax Realtor in Calgary too but in my decades of real life experiences in Canada the still too often unenforced existing laws, regulating societies, governments clearly did not stop too many Realtors, Lawyers, Pastors or even the cops now, Corporations too, Bell Sympatico from cheating, stealing, lying to the customers, others. It does not mean that have to accept it still too.   Garbage in means garbage out.. As a person who watches TV and films too , and often there is much too junk, garbage  In spite of the spin , the spin doctors, in reality Telus, Bell and Roger’s customers will have the same types of difficulties, problem next with the wireless system too after all they are dealing with the same inadequate pretentious firms.. they seems firstly to treat customers, citizens as dirt.. with disrespect clearly.. like the New Conservatives and the Liberals seem to do as well in Canada.. Unacceptable 

.

Bell targets ‘bandwidth hogs’The Gazette (Montreal) – The last few weeks haven’t been kind to Bell Sympatico. The Internet service provider has been attacked from many sides by those angry with its traffic-shaping policy. This whole issue of throttling was brought to light when some customers who have the tools to measure their bandwidth noticed changes in their speeds. http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=61d653fb-18b7-4c50-82b5-f720  

.

It was in July 2007 when for the first time I measured the speed of my internet services on a Bell recommend site http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest and when I found out the answer I next contacted Bell and all of the major newspapers editors, major MPs now too and rightfully complained Bell had deceived me, mislead me about the Speeds it was giving me.. Bell had broken my contractual obligations On top of that

“On throttling, the Bell folks deny that such a slowdown exists, and if it does they say it is not from traffic shaping. But customers of Bell Canada have reported that they are experiencing a loss of as much as 90 percent of their normal bandwidth and speed. Devil’s Advocate said,in April 9th, 2008 at 5:50 pm I used to think that regulation was a bad thing. Bell has singlehandedly corrected that thinking, at least where a monopoly is involved!

.

Bell has been such an evil dictator to everyone for so long now. But, somehow, I knew there would come a day when Bell would have to answer for all of it.

.

Between the neutrality issue, the anti-throttling petition, and the anti-competition suits, Bell (and Rogers) has clearly demonstrated there is a blatant need for communications giants to be held accountable.

Canada is far behind in thier internet technology compared with Europe…where they have speeds of 20MB….compared to my current service with sympatico hoovering about 2MB…on a good day. This is not due to P2P applications as it is to poor infrastructure…IMHO.” http://www.bloggernews.net/115043  

.

 The  NDP they along with the news media, CBC, the gazette, etc they have been also pursuing their objection to Bell’s poor services, capping.

.

Bell says it has problems with their phone lines, equipment for years now too. Just do an internet search and you will see the same complaints for years now too from customers. That was one reason they Bell are switching over to wireless and putting their money there now. Yes on my site I had displayed the truth about Sympatico Bell’s connectivity, and the deliberate capping problems as I now know it. This major problem of Bell’s inadequacy is likely Canada wide, and it will costs millions of dollars likely to deal with, All money they Bell do not want to spent apparently to deal with these problems, and it will likely not be solved as they have not been solved in my case. Bell they are spending the money on the new wireless system now as I have said. I have told all people the truth of Bell as to how I as a Bell customer have experienced it the last 15 months, as well as telling it to the news media, government, and it has to be followed up at a much higher level clearly even likely in the Queen’s courts, CRTC, Consumer affairs, federal cabinet.. There is the video cable alternative, others too… Well at least the major news media is exposing Bell now too and the NDP, plus hopefully others too. Check your Bell internet speed at http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/  regularly and let us all know what it is really like .. and it should be at least 6300 kbs or more as I had (temporarily) gotten it.. Law and order, Public exposure and prosecution of the major guilty persons serves as the best solution, deterrent to all now still too. What else do you want me to do about it too? I have asked ma Bell to give a credit to all it’s customers who were ripped of too. Even me.

.

Law and order, Public exposure and prosecution of the major guilty persons serves as the best solution, deterrent to all now still too. Professionals, Politicians

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Hi paul kambulow,It’s been brought to my attention many times that your multiple posts in different thread are disturbing other forum clients with their own issues.

After warning you several times of this and because your continuing doing so I’m now going to close your forum account.

Thank you for your understanding in this matter.

The post of yours are nolonger available for viewing.
If you need assistance please contact the system administrator.
Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Previous Post  |  Next Post
Posted 8:16 AM by paul kambulow
So this how you Bell still deal with People who complain about Bell’s bad, poor, inadequate services, you deny their right of free speech, basicaly a false excuse as we can all see,
Yes, I will post your reply on the net for the whole world to read that Bell doe not want the truth to be known or dealt with.
Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Posted Apr 27, 2008 by paul kambulow
Boy do you still try to over simplify things for others.. and miss the whole big, bad picture. I really suggest you and Bell first do look at my page on Contract law facts in full.

1: Bell for 6 months starting in January 1007 undeniably also had wasted much of my time. Bell had lied to me for 6 months as to the false cause of their slow internet speeds, and Bell blamed it on anything but Bell’s poor, inadequate phone lines, and that was all really unacceptable. Bell here now too was already unacceptably guilty of false and misleading advertising to me about their promised speeds, also about their capacity to deliver their services too , and my whole local community now too. That was the big issue still unresolved adequately by Bell for many others in my community now too. In December 2007 I did not ask Bell for 304 dollars credit I had firstly agreed with Bell for next the 6 months free unlimited download internet next to compensate for the reality that now for many years Bell never firstly supplied me as obligated a high speed internet service because Bell’s EXISTING PHONE LINES COULD NOT HANDLE IT, and Bell had also supplied me still on top of that also a very troubled internet service. Bell next did not honour the spirt, the intent of my agrement with them in December 2007. Now I personally had asked this year for 500 dollars immediate payment rightfully in addition for all the problems Bell next caused me too. I will shortly increase that request to 1000 dollars, and also rightfully increase a demand from 6 months to one year free unlimited high speed internet services from Bell, if they do continue to trouble me on all of this, my rightfully payment for all of the unacceptable aggravations, and their clear failure still to meet the contract agreement, for Bell they ARE GUILTY OF contract breach definitely.

2: Secondly those liars at Bell had lied and had said next in 2008 that I had upgraded my Internet services, but they still cannot prove that ..IRONICALLY THE MENTIONED UPGRADE WAS A MISLEADING TERM, it undeniably WAS A WORSE CONTRACT RATHER FIRSTLY TOO, and why would I be so stupid to do that and to go for 7 megs when Bell firstly could not deliver the reliable, steady continuous 6 megs internet service they had undeniably promised me in July 2007 and next it did even last most of this 2008 year now too.

3: The 55$ for Bell;s unsolicited 2 wire modem. Was this credited to me? How in the world would I know when I cannot access or get a copy of the billing statements for this year from Bell still? and why is that?

4: The Overdraft charges of 75 for Bell’s double-billing twice even in one month were falsely not paid to me yet by Bell. But what else is new Dealing with Bell is clearly a really big trouble for half of the persons too. Bell can only be trusted to lie, and screw things up and Bell does not honour their contract agreement as I have witnessed.Thanks for the interest

Have a nice day
Paul
http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Posted 8:07 AM by paul kambulow
> but as you said you don’t even know if its been credited recently to you.> Aside from being taken for a ride with the line problem for months (which many, including myself can relate to), and them threatening to terminate your services,

>As for your contract law comment, you stated you didn’t accept the new contract, so what contract are you in?

>Why don’t you either just leave Bell and use Quebec Cable for both phone and internet?

>Also Quebec courts are usually very favorable to the small guy. Why not bring up your contract law case there and show the people what can be done? Show the example. It doesn’t cost much to do this.

>Do you think this ‘tech help forum’ can do anything about the contract or the interpretation of the clauses there in? or about Bell falsely changing the contract on their own without your approval knowledge too?

> May I once again suggest that you go to court?

>And Bell…
PLEASE give Paul his Bills over the past 6-months that he asked for. Its bad enough that you (Bell) threatened to end the services of a senior in order to scare him off.

>What’s next?

Speaking, dealing about my new and old contract terms with Bell is ongoing ..

This was a forum to allow Bell first to rectify their inadequacies right on! Tech here had said that my issues were being escalated, looked after too.. so they lie too.. so who is looking after ? what is his name and telephone number?

Public exposure, telling the truth to all how lying, pretentious, inadequate and what Bell is really like, does, is the start of all real justice..

I rightly even here have not agreed with any of Bell’s lies, bad services, bad follow up.. so how anyone can try to say I did is another distorted over simplification.

Paul Kambulow

From: Paul Kambulow
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:34 PM
To: contractsmanager@sympatico.ca
Cc: executive.office@bell.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; Dussault.Madeleine@cb-bc.gc.ca ; marketplace@cbc.ca
Subject: Bell lies about what it does, wants to do still. KMM16616921V25471L0KM, KMM16681313V70004L0KM

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/action/forums/displaypost?postID=10146497 Previous Post | Next Post
Posted 11:20 PM by paul kambulow
Boy do you still try to over simplify things for others.. and miss the whole big, bad picture. I really suggest you and Bell first do look at my page on Contract law facts in full.
1: Bell for 6 months starting in January 1007 undeniably also had wasted much of my time. Bell had lied to me for 6 months as to the false cause of their slow internet speeds, and Bell blamed it on anything but Bell’s poor, inadequate phone lines, and that was all really unacceptable. Bell here now too was already unacceptably guilty of false and misleading advertising to me about their promised speeds, also about their capacity to deliver their services too , and my whole local community now too. That was the big issue still unresolved adequately by Bell for many others in my community now too. In December 2007 I did not ask Bell for 304 dollars credit I had firstly agreed with Bell for next the 6 months free unlimited download internet next to compensate for the reality that now for many years Bell never firstly supplied me as obligated a high speed internet service because Bell’s EXISTING PHONE LINES COULD NOT HANDLE IT, and Bell had also supplied me still on top of that also a very troubled internet service. Bell next did not honour the sprit, the intent of my agreement with them in December 2007. Now I personally had asked this year for 500 dollars immediate payment rightfully in addition for all the problems Bell next caused me too. I will shortly increase that request to 1000 dollars, and also rightfully increase a demand from 6 months to one year free unlimited high speed internet services from Bell, if they do continue to trouble me on all of this, my rightfully payment for all of the unacceptable aggravations, and their clear failure still to meet the contract agreement, for Bell they ARE GUILTY OF contract breach definitely.

2: Secondly those liars at Bell had lied and had said next in 2008 that I had upgraded my Internet services, but they still cannot prove that ..IRONICALLY THE MENTIONED UPGRADE WAS A MISLEADING TERM, it undeniably WAS A WORSE CONTRACT RATHER FIRSTLY TOO,and why would I be so stupid to do that and to go for 7 megs when Bell firstly could not deliver the reliable, steady continuous 6 megs internet service they had undeniably promised me in July 2007 and next it did even last most of this 2008 year now too.

3: The 55$ for Bell’s unsolicited 2 wire modem. Was this credited to me? How in the world would I know when I cannot access or get a copy of the billing statements for this year from Bell still? and why is that?

4: The Overdraft charges of 75 for Bell’s double-billing twice even in one month were falsely not paid to me yet by Bell. But what else is new Dealing with Bell is clearly a really big trouble for half of the persons too. Bell can only be trusted to lie, and screw things up and Bell does not honour their contract agreement as I have witnessed.

Thanks for the interest

Have a nice day
Paul
http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/

Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street, LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home Tel 514-363-7316

Posted 4:46 PM by paul kambulow http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/forums/displaypost.jsp?postID=10146493&postID=10146493
Nothing has basically changed the last 4 months, or the last 4 weeks on my wrongful and much too many Bell Sympatico problems.
Bell for sure did not yet pay me for the overdraft charges for double-billing me too.

Bell for sure did not yet pay me for the overdraft charges for double-billing me too.

I do not know anything at all really here too for Bell will not talk to me for when I contact them they say that some one from Bell has been appointed from the president’s office to deal with the issues he alone can deal with this, and he too has not talked to me as well next on any of this .. All I still I get useless run around from Bell support, Bell executive care and Bell accounting still on all of this.

My December agreement of free 6 months Internet was credited to me.. But it was illegally transferred from my unlimited account into the new account that I had not authorized, approved, requested, all as usual without my knowledge or permission too.

Bell is an incompetent dictatorship, Unbelievable Even my Bell internet speed was fluctuating, really slow and crappy again this weekend too.

So I wrote today more letters of protest, complaints to Bell and others..

What a bad way for Bell to run their business while the whole world can watch it now too..

Have a nice day
Paul

Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street, LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home Tel 514-363-7316


PS Bell is capping their email too. A letter was posted to my 3 different emails from a Microsoft site and the letter arrives days later on Sympatico email.

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 88 other followers