The non conformer's Canadian Weblog

April 1, 2011

It should be an election issue – the Bad phone companies

 

At reelection times they all do make promises, and once elected they even do make some laws, but they also do tend to  pass the buck next generally as well. That is the unacceptable general problem with Canada’s pretentious politicians,  consumer affairs Ministers, Health and justice  ministers, Civil and public servants, the RCMP police included too often now as well who like to dump, dumb you, leave you on your own as quick as possible. Civil and public servants, and Phone cell companies employees are all very much the same,, they seem too often to lie claiming they will do a good job to get a pay but when it comes to delivering the work effectiveness promises they start to quote established polices.. buck passing excuses.

  http://postedat.wordpress.com/2011/04/26/virgin-mobile-canada-has-this-breached-the-quebec-laws-3-times-now-too-in-my-case/

The consumer abuses by   Bell, Rogers, Virgin, Telus, Primus  etc. they all should be an election issue..

Majority of Canadians they just want  all pricing to be fair — and Bell, Rogers, Telus, Shaw and Videtron etc., so far have been anything but.

  The present truths about Canada’s  phone, cell phone, internet communication businesses

 

Truth 1  The federal government including the CRTC and the Consumer affairs, industry Ministers do  not consistently regulate, monitor, supervise     Canada’s  phone, cell phone, internet communication business, major telecommunications firms and their employees as well for their false, misleading advertisings, blatant lies, abusive of the customers, nor specially  for their too often bad, immoral, pretentiously lying service departments and the CRTC itself does not all even investigate, prosecute the immoral company representatives who lie, mislead the customers.
 
Truth 2 Dealing with the service departments of the internet providers, cell or phone companies,in obtain a new service or cancelling an existing services  too often is one of the worst personal experiences as these firms tend to be vague, uncooperative, unhelpful, and seem to place deliberate customer obstacles in the way. In the last year I  have personally dealt with Rogers, Primus, Bell, Virgin mobile and none of these firms customers services were acceptable.These firms have the ability to make the customer services department to be helpful, cooperative, friendly, informative, to be simplified  and to expedite  matters instead they seem undeniably to like to confuse issues, put obstacles into the customer’s ways too. These sales customer representatives tend to talk to me falsely as though they themslves now are qualified, lawyers, judges and do sate that their own interpretation of the laws, contract is always right and this in reality now is far from the truth, not in reality in accordance with the applicable federal and provincial laws too.
 
 
Truth 3  Canada’s  phone, cell phone, internet communication business Industry too often mislead the customers by claiming that their industry is regulated and they would not even exist in business if they had  cheated, lied, for the government would not let them, but nothing can be further from the truth now as well. For they also do lie  when it claims that it tends to follow their own High  industry standard, for they themselves tend  not regulate their own  bad employees, as their self regulation tends to be another form of masturbation.The industry standard also now generally  is one it seems of lying to the customers, the potential customers, working at obtaining and keeping the customers at any costs,immoral acts included.
 
For example many of the major internet supply firms too often too they also now  do  tend to claim , advertise the fact they do have the highest  internets speed , and a simple truth is that they all cannot make a similar statement for sure.
 
Truth 4  The phone, cell phone, internet communication companies individually like to lie, mislead the customers by claiming that their too often abusive, one sided contracts now  are all legally bind, even if they already do break even existing  federal and provincial laws even. The rather too often hypocritical INDUSTRY often still ask the customers to hold to their own definitions of the contract rules while they themselves too often undeniably do not hold the normal rules of decency and ACCEPTABLE standard.
 
Truth 5   Furthermore each firm has its own standard but not always applicable  contracts that vary significantly  between the firms as well that too often are not detailed firstly to the customers beforehand as well during the initial contract stages
 
 My being used to producing engineering designs, reports, cost control reports I am used to put it into writing but I am next realy surprised how many persons in the governments, telecommunication industry find an excuse not to write back, ask instead to talk to me by phone, cause they do not want any evidences of their wrong doings in writing firstly. Just for example ask your phone company to send you a copy of your specific contract, your latest agreement details with them  and you will see jowl they are all reluctant to do so now. While they will even on the phone promise to do so they will next not do so generally. These people too often do know that they can lie on the phone without facing negative consequences, SO I LIKE TO FOLLOW UP ALL PHONE CONVERSATIONS, AGREEMENT  IN WRITING TO THEM https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/basic-contract-law/ 
 

With Bell backing down on Internet billing, it just might not become an election issue…  (but it probably should be) Toronto Life – ‎Mar 29, 2011‎  Bell announced a new pricing plan that would allow independent Internet service providers to buy wholesale access in large chunks without having to pass on the caps and overage charges Bell was insisting on. The hordes of angry Internet users who were outraged about the CRTC’s decision on usage-based billing (UBB) chalked up a minor win yesterday. Bell announced a new pricing plan that would allow independent Internet service providers to buy wholesale access in large chunks without having to pass on the caps and overage charges Bell was insisting on. (The previous policy could have been summed up as “do what we say and thank us for the privilege.”) Many observers, however, say it’s not enough.

CANOE   BCE Inc. may have backtracked on its proposed usage-based Internet billing scheme but the flip-flop doesn’t change the fact that Canadians pay too much for metered web access, according to a leading e-commerce expert.–
 Zeropaid  OpenMedia.ca, a Canadian non-profit advocacy organization and outspoken critic behind the Stop the Meter campaign to stop UBB, says it is “pleased” with Bell Canada’s decision to back down.
 
 
 
 Bell , Rogers, etc are, after all, mostly federally unregulated companies,.. and these bad big businesses get the corporate tax breaks from the Conservatives too.. they should rather pay a higher tax..
    

 

“Canada’s Worst Cell Phone Bill” BELONGS TO BELL but it seems the other phone interent companies are not much better..

      

Virgin Mobile Canada As I have found many times in March 2011 even even weekly firsthand there is no reality between the cheap mere words of Virgin’s advertised statement for caring about the customer and next still the actual  very unsatisfactory poor Virgin Mobile Canada  customer service   provided when it comes to dealing even with a valid Virgin customer complaints.. next in six weeks now they all I had talked to at Virgin still were unable to cancel the original request of mine to my cell phone service or even to  give me a proper Virgin  finalized statement of account. and instead the Virgin customer care, the Virgin Billing and accounting departments  continued to bill me for my phone services and to disregard my requests and all of Virgin had even failed to correct their inadequacies towards me even  many times.. 

 

On 4/1/2011 12:37 PM, Virgin Mobile Canada wrote:  Hello, Paul! Marlee here with Virgin Mobile, helping you out and getting you on track as quickly as possible is what I’m all about, However, there are times when contacting support via telephone is going to be necessary. Our Member Care Team will be more than happy to provide you with any information regarding the canceled account. As per privacy policies I am not permitted to access or provide information from within an account via email. You can touch base with Member care by dialing 1-888-999-2321. Advisers are ready to help you out 8:00 am to 12:00 am EST. Monday to Saturday and 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Sunday. Thank you for contacting support via email. Have a great weekend.
 
Regards,
Marlee
VMC Team
 
 Paul [THREAD_ID:28512378]” . 
Virgin is clearly a  bunch of crappy liars and are all incompetent, pretenders, for  talked to their phone support by phone 5 days and all they did was, do lie.. they instead of cancelling my phone insisted on trying to make more money by not cancelling it.  I was promised last week by Virgin on the phone i would get my updated balance statement and the refund for my cell phone overpayment,  as well in the mail immediately mail by next week and so far I got neither.. You Virgin do all lie when you say you care about the customer and that you will service them properly even..
   
   So I now again phoned Virgin and Virgin now says in contrast that it will take up to 90 days for me to get my money back.  Virgin is stealing my money by not giving it back to me… next Virgin again promises by next week to have all of this issue resolved. Can you belive any of what they say for I do not..

 

Virgin Mobile Canada  screws up a simple cell phone and the related cell phone number cancellation procedure. Virgin Mobile Canada Customer services again  told me  today by phone that they have no power, control over the Virgin Mobile Canada billing , account procedures. statements. refunds, departments.. Now even months later from Feb 15, 2010 Virgin Mobile Canada  has not even kept any of their many last Virgin Mobile Canada promises to escalate my Virgin Mobile Canada billing statement, money refund  and on April 13, 2011 Virgin Mobile Canada BECAUSE  clearly is so incompetent they Virgin Mobile Canada that they do continually   do on the phone make useless Virgin Mobile Canada promises . Next Virgin Mobile Canada again informed me that  there is nothing else they can now even do for me cause they are the  Virgin Mobile Canada customer billing  inquiry representative and they are are only a basically useless, powerless Virgin Mobile Canada Customer billing, phone representative, and so they  Virgin Mobile Canada do not know when I will next get my due Virgin Mobile Canada credit,  my money,  my Virgin Mobile Canada cheque, my Virgin Mobile Canada final bill  in the mail, they Virgin Mobile Canada do continue to send me for moths the wrong bills, and it takes Virgin Mobile Canada 4 to 6  weeks to next  correct them so, but over 2 months had passed and they Virgin Mobile Canada have missed their original promised deadline too to do so.. so  they Virgin Mobile Canada continue to lie to me all the time.. they Virgin Mobile Canada do in writing promise you a good Virgin Mobile Canada customer service, they Virgin Mobile Canada claim they have got an award for 5 years for the best customers services, but the reality as I see it differs now  .. Now I get a new Virgin Mobile Canada promise i will get my Virgin Mobile Canada cheque 3 to six weeks from the first  week of April 2011 when my Virgin Mobile Canada account was now supposedly closed.. Virgin Mobile Canada they cannot  DO ANYTHING GOOD FOR ME HERE..The next  Virgin Mobile Canada final statement will only be billed to me on the 16 of April, plus it will take at least another 5 to 9 days and then it may be shipped to me? The Virgin Mobile Canada customer service by Virgin was, is stated to me today as being  the best in the world according to the last 5 years but my own undeniable witness and reality is that Virgin Mobile Canada statement itself as well is all crap. stating lies,  mere  useless words.. having to me no evidence of such a fact.

 

         

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

… 

January 9, 2010

Public Mobile files suit against Globalive decision supported by Bell, Rogers, Telus too..

Public Mobile files suit against Globalive decision supported by Bell, Rogers, Telus. etc., too.. Public Mobile, a low-cost wireless carrier with plans to launch in early 2010, said it asked the Federal Court to overturn the cabinet decision that permitted Globalive Wireless Management Corp. to launch last month with significant foreign backing.  http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/wireless-entrant-seeks-court-ruling/article1425301/

 
THIS IS JUST MORE MANURE, CRAP  WHERE  CORPORATE LIARS, THIEVES ASK THE GOVERNMENT TO RESPECT THE LAWS WHEN THEY DO NOT… THEY ARE JUST MORE HYPOCRITES EVEN THE CRTC’s Farcical hearings on Internet speed are still all AS USELESS AS THE bad BETTER BUSINESS BUREAUS, CONSUMER AFFAIRS MINISTERS…
  
Are any of you still also one of those stupid fools who does not realize that the big, bad crooks seem always to demand that you firstly respect the laws, play fair, pay by their rules too so you can always lose? When these big giant crooks start to play instead  honestly, fair, decently, stop lying, abusing the customers too, then and only then would I start to listen to any of their complaints even in the Queen’s courts now too..
  
HEY WE ALL KNOW THESE BIG TELECOMMUNICATIONS FIRMS DEMAND THAT YOU HAVE TO RESPECT THE CONTRACT, YOU CANNOT GET OUT OF IT WITHOUT PAYING A BIG PENALTY, AND YOU CANNOT CHANGE IT, BUT THEY DEMAND THE RIGHT TO BREAK IT, CHANGE IT, ANYTIME THEY WANT THE LAST DECADES YEARS NOW TOO.. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE PERVERSITIES BY THEM AS WELL..
  
I RECENTLY FILLED IN AGAIN AN ONLINE COMPLAINT ABOUT BELL’S  LONG TIME UNACCEPTABLE, FALSE, MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENT   AND I WAS PROMISED A RESPONSE WITHIN 2 DAYS.. DREAM ON.. IT IS LIKE THE USELESS FEDERAL CONSUMER DEPARTMENT THAT PROMISES YOU NOW A RESPONSE WITHIN 30 DAYS AND YOU GET A NO GOOD, USELESS FORM REPLY RATHER, IF YOU EVEN GET AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT HERE TOO. 
  
YES THE BAD  TYPE OF ACTS, BEHAVIOR ON THEIR PARTS   is just more unacceptable manure, crap only.. this is just another form of the deadly Hospital shit diseases we hear about so  often these days still too.. https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/hospital-deaths-account-for-half-of-deaths-annually/
 
TELL THEM ALL TO CLEAN THEIR OWN  WASHROOMS FIRST NOW.. starting with all of the justice ministers
 
 
 
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/crtc-farcical-hearings-on-internet-speed-control/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/about-time-big-3-put-into-their-place-bell-rogers-and-telus/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/bells-lies-vs-reality-again/ 
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/i-cannot-trust-you-for-you-lie-to-me-all-the-time/
 
http://picasaweb.google.com/anonconformer/Thenonconformer

January 4, 2010

Drunk drivers in Ontario for a start

 Drink Alcohol and Die « The non conformer’s Canadian Weblog   Drink Alcohol and Die or Kill is fast becoming Canada’s preoccupation, main goal, slogan.. Alcohol and alcoholics the unacceptable main cause of vehicular  accidents, domestic violence, and so many other ills… DRUNK DRIVING  KILLS AT LEAST 5 TIMES MORE PERSONS OVER SPEEDING FIRSTLY  https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/alcohol/
 In February, SGI’s annual report on traffic accidents in Saskatchewan showed the total number of collisions involving alcohol in 2014 was the lowest it had been in five years. However, the number of fatal accidents involving alcohol didn’t follow that trend, with 17 more people killed in crashes involving alcohol in 2014 than in 2013.

LET US ALL STOP HIRING, ELECTING LIARS OR THE ALCOHOLICS

 
 In Ontario there is a  Jump in Alcohol Related Deaths on Eastern Ontario Roads Monday, January 4, 2010
 
WHEN YOU COMPARE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE KIILED IN ALL CANADIAN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IT IS VERY VERY INSIGNFICANT NOW  in direct comparison  as to how many persons,  about 225,000 Canadian patients a year suffer from hospital-acquired infections that substantially extend their stays, and note this  between 8,000 and 12,000 people in Canada die annually as a result of  infection with common but dangerous infections – C. difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) – The infections   C. difficile, MRSA and VRE – are not airborne, but spread by contact. But still yet the police make a lot of noise about number of   deaths caused by vehicular speeding..why?  It seems the Police would be better used in Hospitals instead.  Yes likely the main reason that Hospital roommates increase the risk of infection is that patients share a washroom. (The mantra in infection control is: One bum per toilet.) Another likely explanation involves inadequate handwashing by patients and health professionals alike; doctors and nurses  sometimes don’t wash their hands between patient visits in a single room. in the meantime, there are things we can do: We should be cleaning our hands, and we should really scrutinize how we clean our hospitals.   http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/private-hospital-rooms-lower-risk-of-c-difficile/article1420448/
.

Ex Toronto police chief Julian Fantino is one of those bad apples and we know we do  have too many bad cops  in Canada too.. HE HAD LIED AS TO THE REASONS MANY PEOPLE HAVE CAR ACCIDENTS, HE SAID FALSELY IT WAS SPEEDING AND  HE LEFT OUT ALCOHOL AND WHY? TOO MANY COPS ARE ALCOHOLICS?

.

Speeding is not the major cause of car accidents  road rage, impaired driving is, but speeding is a hidden tax, a good, easy money generator

.

 THE UNACCEPTABLE CANADIAN FACT OF LIFE, IN THE LAST 50 YEARS I HAVE NEVER HAD THE POLICE, RCMP DO ONE SINGLE HONEST INVESTIGATION, BESIDES THEM RATHER FALSELY  INVESTIGATING ME, HARASSING ME ,CAUSE I TOO DO RIGHTFULLY  COMPLAIN LOUDLY, OPENLY OFTEN ABOUT CANADA’S TOO OFTEN PRETENTIOUS, SELF SERVING POLICE FORCES. https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/the-police-already-tap-my-interent-phone/
.

Ontario Provincial Police report a 50 per cent increase in alcohol related deaths on eastern Ontario roads in 2009. Because more people drink alcohol these days too.. 12  people were killed in alcohol related collisions last year, up from eight in 2008.

.

OPP Sgt. Kristine Rae says there is no reason for the increase. Rae tells CFRA News residents are aware that drinking and driving is “not acceptable.” and yet alcoholics still like to drive their cars…. so the  laws have to be enforced all year too..

.

The OPP does report the number of fatal collisions on eastern Ontario roads have dropped by 28 per cent since 2007  and have all these fatal collisions been caused by drunk drivers too? or by bad drivers, road rage, speeding, cell phone users, icy roads..

.

BAD Police Statistics LIKE THIS ARE NOT ONLY USELESS BUT MISLEADING..

Now let the police give us real, valid figures..

– The total number of accidents caused by alcohol had led to how many deaths in Ontario last year?

 – OPP  had  laid   how many impaired driving charges last year.
 
– and how many drivers received a three-day licence suspension and how many drivers were handed administrative licence suspensions for drinking and driving.
 
– The spot checks also resulted in   how many other charges that fell under one of three categories — Liquor Licence Act, Highway Traffic Act and Criminal Code violation.
 
and how many police officers were also now charged fo drunk driving?
.
 
and the main reason the police cannot give us all the real statistics figures on the total number  of the accidents and causes is the lazy, pretentious OPP police have not done detailed accident reports in each accident, but they still took the pay for it?
  
 
 
Here also   is what I also cannot understand, real alcoholics are alcoholics all year and drive all year too impaired.. so why does the OPP police not target drunk drivers all year like they target speeding drivers all year ? 
 
Ontario Provincial Police officers checked more than 1.1 million vehicles in Reduce Impaired Driving Everywhere (RIDE) spotchecks across the province during the Christmas season only.
 
 A total of 5,329 charges were laid from Nov. 27 to Jan. 4, 298 being for impaired driving, blowing over, or refusing to provide a breath sample. The balance were for other Criminal Code, Highway Traffic Act or Liquor Licence Act offences.

A total of 709 driving-licence suspensions were issued to motorists who had a blood alcohol concentration in the .05-.08 range.

 During the same period in 2008, 884,729 vehicles were checked. A total of 319 arrests were made for Criminal Code alcohol-related offences.

and the figures for the rest of the year??? are where?

https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/call-it-what-you-want-but-it-is-not-about-safety/

https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/speeding-is-not-the-major-cause-of-car-accidents-still/

It has been a great disappointment to many to find out THAT the provincial Liberals are not any better over the Conservatives

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/torsun/100107/canada/our_highways_to_hell

January 2, 2010

TOP COP CALLED TO BE ACCOUNTIABLE BY THE COURTS

    
It is stupidly amazing how many crooks, clearly bad persons  are still so unrepentant that they do think that all they have to do is just lie some more, bully some more of their accusers and they will next get away with it.. well they can dream on but there is eventually a limit to the amount of lying, abuse many will take.. The provincial  Liberal government iself does not much good here too. Why? Scared of the cops?  and what do they have to hide? 
 

An Ontario Superior Court judge has ruled OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino can be charged with trying to influence municipal officials by means of threats. Justice David Crane’s decision overturns a ruling a few months ago by a justice of the peace who argued Caledonia activist Gary McHale’s attempt to lay a private charge against Ontario’s top cop did not meet all the required qualifying elements. McHale, who received the court ruling  said the ruling would set a standard for others laying private prosecutions.

In September 2008, McHale filed an order of mandamus stating Fantino should be charged under Section 123 (2) of the Criminal Code of Canada, which constitutes “influencing or attempting to influence a municipal official … by means of threats” as an offence. This was in response to an email Fantino sent in April 2007 to Haldimand County Council telling the mayor and councillors not to attend McHale’s rallies.
TORONTO – A summons was issued Friday against Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner Julian Fantino on allegations that he illegally influenced elected officials in Caledonia, Ont., the site of a long-running aboriginal occupation.  Activist Gary McHale has been pressing to have Fantino charged after the commissioner sent an email allegedly telling the mayor and councillors in Caledonia not to attend McHale’s rallies. McHale led a number of rallies to protest what he called two-tier justice in the policing of the land occupation in the town south of Hamilton.  The Ministry of the Attorney General confirmed a justice of the peace “issued process” against Fantino on one count of influencing or attempting to influence municipal officials. Issuing process was a legal step required before the charges could be officially laid and court dates set.  “I’ve been advised by the Ministry of the Attorney General that a process was issued late this afternoon by a justice of the peace,” Insp. Dave Ross, a provincial police spokesman, said Friday evening. “At this particular time we haven’t seen the process nor has the commissioner been served with any process.”  The ministry said it had sent a letter to McHale, but refused to release the contents.  However, McHale sent the media copies of the letter, signed by lawyer Ken Campbell on behalf of Attorney General Chris Bentley, which said the Crown will move immediately and assume prosecution of the case.  It also assures McHale a special prosecutor will be assigned from the Justice Prosecutions Unit, which was set up to handle cases involving police or other justice officials and is made up of senior Crown counsels with extensive experience in criminal cases.  Ministry spokesman Brendan Crawley said when a private prosecution involves an indictable offence the Crown must intervene and assume the prosecution.  McHale said Friday he was informed by the court in Cayuga, Ont., that a judge signed a summons on the criminal charge of influencing or attempting to influence municipal officials.  Influencing or attempting to influence a municipal official in municipal activities is an offence under the Criminal Code and carries up to a five-year prison term if convicted.  In an email to The Canadian Press, McHale said Fantino is summoned to appear before criminal court in Cayuga on Feb. 3 at 10 a.m.  An Ontario Superior Court justice ruled last week that Fantino must face allegations brought forward by McHale.  A justice of the peace who heard McHale’s complaint refused to issue a summons or warrant for Fantino but Superior Court Justice David Crane ordered the justice to issue the order.  The case is not the first time Fantino and McHale have squared off in court.  McHale faces charges of counselling mischief not committed and Fantino testified during a preliminary hearing earlier this year that he told subordinates he would have gladly arrested McHale himself for inciting civil unrest in Caledonia.  McHale is representing himself in that case as well and questioned Fantino on the witness stand.  During one exchange Fantino told McHale that his repeated visits to Caledonia, already tense over the lengthy aboriginal occupation, dangerously inflamed the situation.  The commissioner called McHale a “lightning rod to the conflict” during his testimony and added police saved McHale from “grievous bodily harm numerous times.”  http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100108/national/fantino_mchale_charges
 
 
Fantino says he’ll defend himself against illegal influence allegation The Canadian Press –  TORONTO – Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner Julian Fantino says he intends to strongly defend himself against an allegation that he illegally influenced elected officials in Caledonia, Ont., the site of a long-running aboriginal occupation. “I intend to vigorously defend myself and the OPP against this allegation and have the utmost confidence in the judicial system,” Fantino said in a statement Saturday. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100109/national/fantino_mchale_charges
 
AND IS HE GOING  TO WASTE MORE TAXPAYER’S MONEY FOR THIS NOW TOO? fire  him now, it is cheaper and better
 
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/ex-toronto-police-chief-julian-fantino-is-one-of-those-bad-apples/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/provincial-police-commissioner-police-personnel-also-known-to-play-dirty-politics/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/speeding-is-not-the-major-cause-of-car-accidents-still/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/cops-lie-too/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/09/16/call-it-what-you-want-but-it-is-not-about-safety/
http://thenonconformer.multiply.com/journal/item/1/No_cop_is_above_the_law
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/its-about-time/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/hidden-municpal-police-taxes/
 https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/03/29/no-such-thing-as-a-little-bit-pregnant/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/dirty-rcmp-lays-dirty-again/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/up-to-no-good/
 
Now about 225,000 Canadian patients a year suffer from hospital-acquired infections that substantially extend their stays, and between 8,000 and 12,000 people die annually as a result of  infection with common but dangerous infections – C. difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) – The infections   C. difficile, MRSA and VRE – are not airborne, but spread by contact. yet the police make a lot of noise about number of   deaths caused by vehicular speeding.. It seems the Police would be better used in Hospitals instead.  
 
Yes likely the main reason that Hospital roommates increase the risk of infection is that patients share a washroom. (The mantra in infection control is: One bum per toilet.) Another likely explanation involves inadequate handwashing by patients and health professionals alike; doctors and nurses sometimes don’t wash their hands between patient visits in a single room. in the meantime, there are things we can do: We should be cleaning our hands, and we should really scrutinize how we clean our hospitals.   http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/private-hospital-rooms-lower-risk-of-c-difficile/article1420448/
  
PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS ARE NOW ALSO BEING CONSIDERED FOR HOSPITALS, HOSPITAL MANAGERS, DOCTORS AND MEDICAL STAFF WHERE PATIENTS HAVE DIED IN HOSPITALS DUE TO THE HOSPITAL’S POOR NEGLECT, BAD MEDICAL PRACTICES.  
 
In 1982 I drove to Edmonton Alberta and sat directly in the Albertan Minister of Economic Development, and the Albertan Minister of Manpower, Career development, and I had asked them face to face what they were doing specially to diversify Alberta’s economy and to help to create more  jobs for Albertans.. but these useless twits still did did nothing, and they both lost their reelections, and their workers too had  let the party caucus decide what to do and so today  Alberta is in a real big big mess today.. with home prices a dropping,  home sales are going doing, many many people getting laid off, and their Alberta  government revenue is going down fast too. Alberta is in a big mess these days still too.. The Albertan politicians, leaders now  were another bunch of know it all who did not want to listen to any one else.. and such History repeats itself.  
 
Now what are we all now really doing about many people dying in all Hospitals unnecessarily these days too? Actions speak louder over mere words
 
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/hospital-deaths-account-for-half-of-deaths-annually/
 
 
 

 
I too am open, straightforward and readily give an explanations here often on behalf of all Canadians as to why I too often find our lying, no good, self serving, pretentious, immoral justice Ministers, civil and public servants, even too many politicians   so despicable. They and their bad friends now too should be rightfully, readily fired, dismissed, lose their jobs, pensions and not be given any bonuses, raises, or severances now  too.
 
 
Some naive news editor wrote back to me last week and he lied and he said no one reads my blog cause of the spelling mistakes and the grammar errors in it, well people care more about the subject content in reality.. I have a hundred thousand readers so far.. cause I write honestly and I do not write to please a crowd, to be politically correct..
 

 

Meanwhile a Bus driver talks on the phone while driving the Bus

 

Meanwhile a Bus driver talks on the phone while driving the Bus in Montreal Quebec.. I saw firsthand a bus driver nearly rear end a car because he was busy on the cellphone and the car driver had slowed down to make an upcoming turn.

In Montreal unlike in Toronto the Bus drivers tend not to be held accountable for any personal wrong doings.. this approach  WRONGFULLY TENDS ALSO  to be applied to all of Quebec’s civil and public servants, at the federal, provincial, municipal levels, even the  police, doctors and nurses included. https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/professionals-what-a-joke/
 
Cell phone junkies in British Columbia and Saskatchewan will now have to think twice before picking up the phone while at the wheel of a vehicle. Both provinces have approved laws that come into effect today, banning the use of cellphones while driving.
 
The goal of both laws is to hopefully reduce driver distraction and thereby reduce accidents.
According to the Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), people who talk on cell phones and drive are six times more likely to be involved in an accident than the average driver. That rate goes up to 23 times more likely for those who text and drive.
 “There is no question that this legislation will make our province’s roads safer,” said Lindsay Olson, the IBC Vice-President for BC, Manitoba and Saskatchewan
 
The two provinces join a lengthening list of Canadian provinces that have enacted similar bans, and the trend appears to be growing globally. Alberta and New Brunswick lack any related legislation, but Ontario, Quebec, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island all have similar rules, and Manitoba is planning to pass a law later this year.
  
 
 
 

January 1, 2010

Fed up? do something good about it.

 


People are asking what they can do to counter the much too much taxpayer’s money abuses, theft, or the too many bad cops,  injustice in the courts, customer abuses, misleading advertisements by big corporations  . Openly write on the net as well, write letters to editors, and today do write letters to the elected officials. Demand now fully instead that  the government deal with your concerns.. . Vent your outrage at your local  elected officials.  –  https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/there-is-no-new-thing-under-the-sun/

 

 

 No one really likes bad publicity, especially the political parties and politicians.. so do let them have it. Public exposure and  shame seems to be a common incentive for many of our elected officials to do their paid task, jobs.. Use your right of free spech now, today, fully as well. I do!

Emails elected officials

Note there is likely a 100 email names restrictions at any one time..
.
Government of Quebec emails legislative members  http://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/deputes/index.html

.

Government of Ontario emails legislative members http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/members/member_addresses.do?locale=en
.
Government of New Brunswick  emails legislative members  http://www1.gnb.ca/legis/bios1/index-e.asp
.
Government of Nova scotia emails legislative members  http://nslegislature.ca/index.php/people/members/

.

Government of PEI emails legislative members  http://assembly.pe.ca/index.php3?number=1024555&lang=E

.

Government of Labrador Newfoundland  emails legislative members http://www.assembly.nl.ca/members/cms/membersalpha.htm
.
Government of Saskatchewan emails legislative members http://www.legassembly.sk.ca/mlas/

.

 Government of Manitoba emails legislative members list       http://www.gov.mb.ca/legislature/members/cabinet.html 
.
Government of BC emails legislative members list                 

http://www.leg.bc.ca/mla/3-1-7.htm

.

Government of Yukon  emails legislative members list    http://www.legassembly.gov.yk.ca/contact.html

.

Government of Northwest Territories emails legislative members list   http://www.assembly.gov.nt.ca/_live/pages/wpPages/members16thassembly.aspx
.
Albertan MLA’s  

 .

see also

 https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/hospital-deaths-account-for-half-of-deaths-annually/

http://picasaweb.google.com/anonconformer/Thenonconformer#

Fed up? do something good about it. III

 

People are asking what they can do to counter the much too much taxpayer’s money abuses, theft, or the too many bad cops,  injustice in the courts, customer abuses, misleading advertisements by big corporations  . Openly write on the net as well, write letters to editors, and today do write letters to the elected officials. Demand now fully instead that  the government deal with your concerns.. . Vent your outrage at your local  elected officials.  –  

Maritmes Emails

New Brunswick

 

Nova Scotia
 
keithbainmla@ns.sympatico.ca, min_env@gov.ns.ca, birdsapd@gov.ns.ca, boudreje@gov.ns.ca, garyburrill@ns.sympatico.ca, caseykl@gov.ns.ca, mlaclarke@ns.sympatico.ca, colwelkw@gov.ns.ca, vconrad@ns.aliantzinc.ca, frankmla@ns.sympatico.ca, info@chrisdentremont.com, ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, hepstein@ns.aliantzinc.ca, billestabrooks@navnet.net, gaudetw@gov.ns.ca, glavinla@gov.ns.ca, gordiegosse@ns.aliantzinc.ca, rhurlburt@ns.aliantzinc.ca, ramonajennexmla@bellaliant.com, kentbj@gov.ns.ca, pictoucentremla@rosslandry.ca, macdonman@gov.ns.ca, mmacdonald@navnet.net, john.macdonell@ns.sympatico.ca, clarriemla@ns.aliantzinc.ca, macleoaw@gov.ns.ca, pcmlas@gov.ns.ca, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca, marilynmoremla@ns.aliantzinc.capercy@percyparis.ca, parkerch@gov.ns.ca, petersdj@gov.ns.ca, chuck@chuckporter.ca, prestsw@gov.ns.ca, preyra@eastlink.ca, rameygw@gov.ns.ca, mhraymondmla@eastlink.ca, regankm@gov.ns.ca, samsonmp@gov.ns.ca, murrayscottmla@eastlink.ca, office@brianskabarmla.ca<office@brianskabarmla.ca>;, ndpcaucus@gov.ns.ca, graham@grahamsteele.ca, theriahe@gov.ns.ca, whalendc@gov.ns.ca, mat.mla@ns.sympatico.ca, dave@davidawilsonmla.ca, wilsond@gov.ns.ca, info@andrewyounger.ca, zannle@gov.ns.ca, jimmorton@kingsnorthmla.ca; tzinck@ns.aliantzinc.ca
 
Newfoundland and Labrador
 
daisyparsons@gov.nl.ca;
PercyBarrett@gov.nl.ca;
Joanburke@gov.nl.ca;
leginfo@assembly.nu.ca;
EByrne@gov.nl.ca;
JackByrne@gov.nl.ca;
davedenine@gov.nl.ca;
KathyDunderdale@gov.nl.ca;
RFitzgerald@gov.nl.ca;
judyfoote@gov.nl.ca;
ClaytonForsey@gov.nl.ca;
Terryfrench@gov.nl.ca;
kathygoudie@gov.nl.ca;
HarryHarding@gov.nl.ca;
THedderson@gov.nl.ca;
JHickey@gov.nl.ca;
HHodder@gov.nl.ca;
jimhodder@gov.nl.ca;
RHunter@gov.nl.ca;
clydejackman@gov.nl.ca;
CharleneJohnson@gov.nl.ca;
yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca;
OLangdon@gov.nl.ca;
BethMarshall@gov.nl.ca;
tommarshall@gov.nl.ca;
Kevinoien@gov.nl.ca;
TOsborne@gov.nl.ca;
sosborne@gov.nl.ca;
JOttenheimer@gov.nl.ca;
kparsons@gov.nl.ca;
GerryReid@gov.nl.ca;
hynesa@gov.nl.ca;
Boidgley@gov.nl.ca;
PShelley@gov.nl.ca;
ShawnSkinner@gov.nl.ca;
lsullivan@gov.nl.ca;
trevortaylor@gov.nl.ca;
leginfo@assembly.nu.ca;
annathistle@gov.nl.ca;
dianne.whalen@gov.nl.ca;
DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca;
rosswiseman@gov.nl.ca;
WallyYoung@gov.nl.ca;

 

Fed up? do something good about it. II

 

People are asking what they can do to counter the much too much taxpayer’s money abuses, theft, or the too many bad cops,  injustice in the courts, customer abuses, misleading advertisements by big corporations  . Openly write on the net as well, write letters to editors, and today do write letters to the elected officials. Demand now fully instead that  the government deal with your concerns.. . Vent your outrage at your local  elected officials.  –  

Ontario MPP/MP Email

 Ontario MPP email addresses:

dmcguinty.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
gsmitherman.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
saggelonitis.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
lalbanese.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
ted.arnott@pc.ola.org,
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bob.bailey@pc.ola.org,
bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
toby.barrett@pc.ola.org,
rbartolucci.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
lberardinetti.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
mbest.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
gbisson@ndp.on.ca,
jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mbrown.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
info@edt.gov.on.ca,
mbryant.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
acarroll.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mchan.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
ted.chudleigh@pc.ola.org,
kcraitor.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bcrozier.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bdelaney.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
dinovoc-qp@ndp.on.ca,
jdickson.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
dduncan.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
garfield.dunlop@pc.ola.org,
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org,
kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
pfonseca.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jgerretsen.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mgravelle.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
fgelinas-qp@ndp.on.ca,
hhampton-qp@ndp.on.ca,
hhkenora@kmts.ca,
ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org,
randy.hillier@pc.ola.org,
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca,
phoy.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
tim.hudak@pc.ola.org,
hjaczek.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
rjohnson.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
sylvia.jones@pc.ola.org,
 
frank.klees@pc.ola.org,
pkormos-qp@ndp.on.ca,
kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jmlalonde.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jleal.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
dlevac.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
lisa.macleod@pc.ola.org,
amangat.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
rmarchese-co@ndp.on.ca,
gerry.martiniuk@pc.ola.org,
dmatthews.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bmauro.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bmauro.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
tmcmeekin.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
pmcneely.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mmeilleur.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
ofa@ofa.gov.on.ca,
pmiller-qp@ndp.on.ca,
jmilloy.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
cmitchell.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
rmoridi.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
julia.munro@pc.ola.org,
bill.murdoch@ontla.ola.org,
ynaqvi.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
john.otoole@pc.ola.org,
dorazietti.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jerry.ouellette@pc.ola.org,
lpendergast.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
gphillips.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mprue-qp@ndp.on.ca,
spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
sqaadri.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
kramal.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
dramsay.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
lrinaldi.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org,
truprecht.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
lsandals.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
joyce.savoline@pc.ola.org,
msergio.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
peter.shurman@pc.ola.org,
msmith.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
gsorbara.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
csousa.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
norm.sterling@pc.ola.org,
tabunsp-co@ndp.on.ca,
htakhar.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
mvanbommel.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jwatson.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
jwilkinson.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
jim.wilson@pc.ola.org,
elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org,
kwynne.mpp@liberal.ola.org,
john.yakabuski@pc.ola.org,
dzimmer.mpp@liberal.ola.org,

========================================================

Ontario Federal MP email addresses:

Albrecht.H@parl.gc.ca,
Allen.Ma@parl.gc.ca,
Angus.C@parl.gc.ca,
Bains.N@parl.gc.ca,
Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca,
Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca,
Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca,
Braid.P@parl.gc.ca,
Brown.G@parl.gc.ca,
Brown.L@parl.gc.ca,
Calandra.P@parl.gc.ca,
Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca,
Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca,
Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca,
Chong.M@parl.gc.ca,
Chow.O@parl.gc.ca,
Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca,
Clement.T@parl.gc.ca,
Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,
Crombie.B@parl.gc.ca,
Davidson.P@parl.gc.ca,
DelMastro.D@parl.gc.ca,
Devolin.B@parl.gc.ca,
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca,
Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
Duncan.K@parl.gc.ca,
Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca,
Finley.D@parl.gc.ca,
Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca,
Galipeau.R@parl.gc.ca,
Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca,
Goodyear.G@parl.gc.ca,
Gourde.J@parl.gc.ca,
Gravelle.C@parl.gc.ca,
Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca,
HallFindlay.M@parl.gc.ca,
Holder.E@parl.gc.ca,
Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hughes.C@parl.gc.ca,
Hyer.B@parl.gc.ca,
Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca,
Kania.A@parl.gc.ca,
Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca,
Kennedy.G@parl.gc.ca,
Kent.P@parl.gc.ca,
Lauzon.G@parl.gc.ca,
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
Lee.D@parl.gc.ca,
Lemieux.P@parl.gc.ca,
MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca,
Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca,
Marston.W@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.T@parl.gc.ca,
Masse.B@parl.gc.ca,
Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca,
McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca,
McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca,
McGuinty.D@parl.gc,
Moore.J@parl.gc.ca,
McKay.J@parl.gc.ca,
McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
Miller.L@parl.gc.ca,
Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca,
Minna.M@parl.gc.ca,
Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca,
OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca,
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
Oliphant.R@parl.gc.ca,
Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca,
Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca,
Preston.J@parl.gc.ca,
Rae.B@parl.gc.ca,
Rafferty.J@parl.gc.ca,
Raitt.L@parl.gc.ca,
Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca,
Reid.S@parl.gc.ca,
Rickford.G@parl.gc.ca,
Rota.A@parl.gc.ca,
Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca,
Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca,
Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca,
Silva.M@parl.gc.ca,
Simson.M@parl.gc.ca,
Stanton.B@parl.gc.ca,
Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca,
Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca,
Thibeault.G@parl.gc.ca,
Tilson.D@parl.gc.ca,
Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca,
Valeriote.F@parl.gc.ca,
VanKesteren.D@parl.gc.ca,
VanLoan.P@parl.gc.ca,
Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wallace.M@parl.gc.ca,
Watson.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca,
Woodworth.S@parl.gc.ca,
Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca,
Young.T@parl.gc.ca,

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

MP email addresses of All  Federal MPs

Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,

Aglukkaq.L@parl.gc.ca,
lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca,
Albrecht.H@parl.gc.ca,
Allen.Ma@parl.gc.ca,
Allen.M@parl.gc.ca,
Allison.D@parl.gc.ca,
Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca,
Anders.R@parl.gc.ca,
Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca,
Andre.G@parl.gc.ca,
Andrews.S@parl.gc.ca,
Angus.C@parl.gc.ca,
Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
Ashfield.K@parl.gc.ca,
Ashton.N@parl.gc.ca,
Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca,
Atamanenko.A@parl.gc.ca,
Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca,
Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca,
Bains.N@parl.gc.ca,
Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,
Beaudin.J@parl.gc.ca,
Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca,
Bellavance.A@parl.gc.ca,
Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca,
Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca,
Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca,
Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca,
Bevington.D@parl.gc.ca,
Bezan.J@parl.gc.ca,
Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca,
Black.D@parl.gc.ca,
Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca,
Blais.R@parl.gc.ca,
Blaney.S@parl.gc.ca,
Block.K@parl.gc.ca,
Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca,
Bouchard.R@parl.gc.ca,
Boucher.S@parl.gc.ca,
Boughen.R@parl.gc.ca,
Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca,
Braid.P@parl.gc.ca,
Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca,
Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
Brown.G@parl.gc.ca,
Brown.L@parl.gc.ca,
Brown.P@parl.gc.ca,
Bruinooge.R@parl.gc.ca,
Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca,
Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca,
Cadman.D@parl.gc.ca,
Calandra.P@parl.gc.ca,
Calkins.B@parl.gc.ca,
Cannan.R@parl.gc.ca,
Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca,
Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca,
Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca,
Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca,
Carrier.R@parl.gc.ca,
Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
Casson.R@parl.gc.ca,
Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca,
Chong.M@parl.gc.ca,
Chow.O@parl.gc.ca,
Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca,
Clarke.R@parl.gc.ca,
Clement.T@parl.gc.ca,
Coady.S@parl.gc.ca,
Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca,
Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,
Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
Crete.P@parl.gc.ca,
Crombie.B@parl.gc.ca,
Crowder.J@parl.gc.ca,
Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca,
Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca,
Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca,
Damours.J@parl.gc.ca,
Davidson.P@parl.gc.ca,
Davies.D@parl.gc.ca,
Davies.L@parl.gc.ca,
Day.S@parl.gc.ca,
DelMastro.D@parl.gc.ca,
Demers.N@parl.gc.ca,
Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca,
Desnoyers.L@parl.gc.ca,
Devolin.B@parl.gc.ca,
Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca,
Dhaliwal.S@parl.gc.ca,
Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,
Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
Dorion.J@parl.gc.ca,
Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
Dreeshen.E@parl.gc.ca,
Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
Dufour.N@parl.gc.ca,
Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca,
Duncan.K@parl.gc.ca,
Duncan.L@parl.gc.ca,
Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca,
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca,
Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca,
Faille.M@parl.gc.ca,
Fast.E@parl.gc.ca,
Finley.D@parl.gc.ca,
Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca,
Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca,
Folco.R@parl.gc.ca,
Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca,
Fry.H@parl.gc.ca,
Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca,
Galipeau.R@parl.gc.ca,
Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca,
Garneau.M@parl.gc.ca,
Gaudet.Ro@parl.gc.ca,
Glover.S@parl.gc.ca,
Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca,
Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca,
Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca,
Goodyear.G@parl.gc.ca,
Gourde.J@parl.gc.ca,
Gravelle.C@parl.gc.ca,
Grewal.N@parl.gc.ca,
Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca,
Guay.M@parl.gc.ca,
Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca,
Guimond.C@parl.gc.ca,
Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca,
HallFindlay.M@parl.gc.ca,
Harris.J@parl.gc.ca,
Harris.R@parl.gc.ca,
Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca,
Hiebert.R@parl.gc.ca,
Hill.J@parl.gc.ca,
Hoback.R@parl.gc.ca,
Hoeppner.C@parl.gc.ca,
Holder.E@parl.gc.ca,
Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hughes.C@parl.gc.ca,
Hyer.B@parl.gc.ca,
Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca,
Jean.B@parl.gc.ca,
Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca,
Julian.P@parl.gc.ca,
Kamp.R@parl.gc.ca,
Kania.A@parl.gc.ca,
Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca,
Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca,
Kennedy.G@parl.gc.ca,
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca,
Kent.P@parl.gc.ca,
Kerr.G@parl.gc.ca,
Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca,
Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca,
Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca,
Lake.M@parl.gc.ca,
Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca,
Lauzon.G@parl.gc.ca,
Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca,
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
Lebel.D@parl.gc.ca,
Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca,
Lee.D@parl.gc.ca,
Lemay.M@parl.gc.ca,
Lemieux.P@parl.gc.ca,
Leslie.M@parl.gc.ca,
Lessard.Y@parl.gc.ca,
Levesque.Y@parl.gc.ca,
Lukiwski.T@parl.gc.ca,
Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca,
Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca,
MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca,
Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca,
MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca,
Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca,
Malo.L@parl.gc.ca,
Maloway.J@parl.gc.ca,
Mark.I@parl.gc.ca,
Marston.W@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.K@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.T@parl.gc.ca,
Masse.B@parl.gc.ca,
Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca,
Mayes.C@parl.gc.ca,
McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca,
McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca,
McKay.J@parl.gc.ca,
McLeod.C@parl.gc.ca,
McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,
Menard.R@parl.gc.ca,
Menard.S@parl.gc.ca,
Mendes.A@parl.gc.ca,
Menzies.T@parl.gc.ca,
Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca,
Miller.L@parl.gc.ca,
Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca,
Minna.M@parl.gc.ca,
McGuinty.D@parl.gc,
Moore.J@parl.gc.ca,
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
Mourani.Ma@parl.gc.ca,
Mulcair.T@parl.gc.ca,
Murphy.B@parl.gc.ca,
Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca,
Murray.J@parl.gc.ca,
Nadeau.R@parl.gc.ca,
Neville.A@parl.gc.ca,
Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca,
Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca,
OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca,
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
Oliphant.R@parl.gc.ca,
Gordon.t@parl.gc.ca,
Ouellet.C@parl.gc.ca,
Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca,
Paille.P@parl.gc.ca,
Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca,
Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca,
Patry.B@parl.gc.ca,
Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca,
Petit.D@parl.gc.ca,
Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca,
Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca,
Pomerleau.R@parl.gc.ca,
Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca,
Preston.J@parl.gc.ca,
Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca,
Rae.B@parl.gc.ca,
Rafferty.J@parl.gc.ca,
Raitt.L@parl.gc.ca,
Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca,
Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca,
Rathgeber.B@parl.gc.ca,
Regan.G@parl.gc.ca,
Reid.S@parl.gc.ca,
Richards.B@parl.gc.ca,
Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca,
Rickford.G@parl.gc.ca,
Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca,
Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca,
Rota.A@parl.gc.ca,
Roy.J@parl.gc.ca,
Russell.T@parl.gc.ca,
Savage.M@parl.gc.ca,
Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca,
Saxton.A@parl.gc.ca,
Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca,
Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca,
Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca,
Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca,
Shea.G@parl.gc.ca,
Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca,
Shory.D@parl.gc.ca,
Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca,
Silva.M@parl.gc.ca,
Simms.S@parl.gc.ca,
Simson.M@parl.gc.ca,
Smith.J@parl.gc.ca,
Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca,
St-Cyr.T@parl.gc.ca,
Stanton.B@parl.gc.ca,
Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
Storseth.B@parl.gc.ca,
Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca,
Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca,
Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca,
ThiLac.E@parl.gc.ca,
Thibeault.G@parl.gc.ca,
Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca,
Tilson.D@parl.gc.ca,
Toews.V@parl.gc.ca,
Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca,
Trost.B@parl.gc.ca,
Trudeau.J@parl.gc.ca,
Tweed.M@parl.gc.ca,
Uppal.T@parl.gc.ca,
Valeriote.F@parl.gc.ca,
VanKesteren.D@parl.gc.ca,
VanLoan.P@parl.gc.ca,
Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca,
Verner.J@parl.gc.ca,
Vincent.R@parl.gc.ca,
Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wallace.M@parl.gc.ca,
Warawa.M@parl.gc.ca,
Warkentin.C@parl.gc.ca,
Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca,
Watson.J@parl.gc.ca,
Weston.J@parl.gc.ca,
Weston.R@parl.gc.ca,
Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca,
Wong.A@parl.gc.ca,
Woodworth.S@parl.gc.ca,
Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca,
Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca,
Young.T@parl.gc.ca,
Zarac.L@parl.gc.ca,
Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca,

 

September 2, 2009

Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services,

  iphone
Canadian cell phone companies are officially giving customers the ability to refuse mid-term changes to their contracts under a new wireless code of conduct. Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association on Tuesday, promises to let customers cancel their contracts without early termination fees if the carrier makes material changes to terms — or customers can refuse the changes outright. So, for example, if a customer is in the middle of a two-year contract and the carrier tries to raise prices, the customer can cancel the contract or continue their existing deal until it expires. “In the case of such material changes that are unfavourable to customers, we either give them the right to terminate the contract without any additional fees for early termination, or allow them to remain on the unchanged contract,” The code specifies that the rule doesn’t apply in the case of changes required by law or for customers without a fixed-term contract. ” They make it sound like they are doing us a favour my actually honouring a contract.”  “How nice of them to let us get out of a contract that was broken by the other party. You’d think common sense would have just allowed us to always do this. Wow, now contracts really GO both ways?” ”  This doesn’t mean a thing, Compainies like Rogers will finad another way to screw you like they have done for years.”
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/09/01/cwta-wireless-code-conduct.html
 
 How basically absurd in the first place.   The companies were by law already not allowed to change the terms of a SIGNED contract but yet they did anyway. All just ” More PR and BS!” Also ” Rogers is the worst culprit for their unrelenting repetitive telemarketing calls.” ” Just all more manure  to keep the related incompetent civil and public servants looking busy”. Cellular firms get new customer rules but they still have not honoured all the old ones.. Canada’s mobile phone companies will be required to make sure consumers understand their contracts when they buy a cellphone under a new code of conduct but will the phone companies next fully honour the same contracts? Unlikley. 
 
This code of conduct in a very short while even  next was already abused, misused by Rogers.. https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/about-time-big-3-put-into-their-place-bell-rogers-and-telus/
 
 There also have been well-publicized stories about users who fully befdorehand  didn’t understand the terms of their bills when it cames to text messaging or downloading movies or music and  they thus ended up with monthly bills costing thousands of dollars.  Horror stories have often already abounded about customers with unexpectedly very high cell phone bills due to a carrier over charging, or  customers being lied to,  misinformed ,  never originally being fully communicated when signing their original contract, promsied servcies not even delivered fully.  The supposedly new  supported code of conduct is now supposedly designed to help all of the wireless subscribers now understand all of their bills better, including the actual terms of service, contract agreements and advertising promises, all which  would not be even required, applicable if  all of the firm and employees  of these firms were honest in reality in the first place. The too often liars and bad employees are not about to stop their wrong doing because of a supposed new code very likely. The liars in the firms, elsewhere in rality  they all do need to be fired from their jobs firstly instead. Unless you do that all you have now is just another farcical merry go round.  Thus unkept promises, unenforced  and inadequate regulating of these firms is still the major bad problem. These are mostly the same firms, ISPs for the most part that had before  lied to us all already about their poor Internet services too. Now they  resolve your complaints efficiently, fairly and courteously? Ha, ha, ha,  rather they will find rather a buck passing way, false  excuse why they cannot help you in reality, as I have recently  experienced now too. PR is still mostlty lies these days. https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/buyer-beware-beware/
 
Most Consumer advocates don’t think much of the new code. A code of conduct adopted by Canada’s cell phone service providers is a political answer that doesn’t address real consumer concerns, another competent  critic now has still charged .The code will be administered by the useless, pretentious  Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, a body set up two years ago by the industry to negotiate disputes between customers and companies.    
 
In its first year, 2007-08,  CCTS was still unable able to resolve about 40  per cent, of the complaints according to its own website. What a very high failure rate.  About one-third of the complaints were related to wireless services. 40  per cent, that is about the number of unhappy Customers with Bell’s Internet services too
  
Telecommunications analyst Eamon Hoey of Hoey Associates said the code is meaningless.“There’s nothing impressive about a code of conduct,” he said. “This is just a way of smoothing over the obvious. They haven’t served their customers very well. Now they’re coming in with a political solution to what should be a customer solution.”Hoey said the litany of complaints about cellphone service in Canada includes “astronomical” base fees, lengthy contracts that are expensive to get out of, poor coverage outside of cities, charges for services such as 911 that may not be available, add-ons such as system access fees and problems with roaming charges. http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/calgary/Code+conduct+phone+service+providers+nothing+impressive/1951350/story.html
 

I heard firsthand one teenager saying to another teenager “I cannot trust you, you lie to me all the time” and this next had made me reflect upon the reality that the average person lies 3 times in every ten minutes of conversation, and it also reminded me with my past years of undeniable dealing with Bell related to my internet download problems, they too had lied to me all the time, by not admitting the truth first that there was a problem, nor next honestly admitting the cause of the problem. It seems that spin doctoring, misleading, lying to others is a very major part of not just the lawyers, used car salesmen, but a regular part of the sales, advertising, corporate way of doing business with consumers these days Canada wide now as well. I too at least am known for telling the truth and that is worth much too. Bell is a known liar and that is not worth much.. The big corporates do prefer no outside regulating bodies, they want to to deal with each customer individually, divide and conquer approach, for they are afraid of massive class action suits, and there are many now against Bell even.

 
Look I have rightfully hundreds of time to the government, on the net, to the news media already have said that Bell is undeniably, unacceptable too, a bad big despotic control freak, monopolistic, immoral, deceptive in reality, practice, and in reality Bell itself does not honour the normal, decent laws, rules, regulations. Bell solely is a dictator that wants all others to play by it’s own rules. Bell does not know how to respect, keep, honour the terms of it’s contractual obligations to it’s own customers, immoral Bell rather likes to rewrite the contract continuously, one sided so that it is always better solely for Bell.

Well even if Bully abusive Bell falsely under the guise of profitability, competitiveness, making more profit or whatever, now still thinks it is a big, large, established firm, corporation that does not have to play by the established rules, rather it can make it’s own rules. I on behalf of all Canadian, Bell’s customers even now, I am rightfully asking nevertheless that the federal government, prime Minister Stephen Harper and his cabinet exemplary force Bell to respect the laws of decency, norms, the established regulations and to even regulate next rightfully Bell much more so that bad Bell definitely stops being guilty of it’s undeniable false misleading advertising practices, unfair and restrictive trade practices for the good of all Canadians now as well , not just for the good of Bell.

Imagine that Bell has been in Business for many years and was, is still too often, wrongfully guilty now clearly of misleading advertisements, fraudulent and unacceptable business practices, not living up to their contractual obligations, as I now have PERSONALLY WITNESSED, EXPERIENCED and undeniably detailed to even Bell and many others and many times too now . I had Paid for a high speed unlimited download service but that is not what I got next. I got low internet speed at a high price. With Bell you have to check your actual delivered speeds , “internet download and upload speed test” continually too cause Bell wrongfully seems always to change it to suit themselves..

Quebec to end automatic cell phone contract renewals, surprise fees and what about the Internet service providers, who are the same firms doing the same bad things there too to the customers, well?

“Quebec to end automatic cellphone contract renewals, surprise fees CBC.ca – The Quebec government has tabled legislation to better protect consumers in the province when they sign cellphone contracts. Justice Minister Kathleen Weil said laws aimed at protecting cellphone users were written in the early 1970s and don’t address current consumer habits. She said Bill 60, introduced Tuesday, would revise outdated rules. There can be “very onerous penalty fees” to pull out of a contract once a service provider automatically renews it – usually for a period lasting three years, Weil said. The bill would prohibit the renewal of cellphone contracts without a customer’s written approval, she said. It would also force merchants to disclose the total cost of the goods and services offered, a move Weil said should prevent customers from being caught off guard by hefty fees for services they don’t want, such as text messaging. In addition, companies won’t be able to suddenly increase fees during the life of the contract. “Consumers often don’t understand everything that they have agreed to when they’ve signed that contract,” the minister said. “The contracts are a little vague, and there are services that are added over time without their knowledge and without their consent.” “The first thing that [merchants] do is offer you a free cellphone, and it’s sort of the lure that gets you into that relationship,” Weil told reporters. Merchants will have to explain existing warranty protection Weil said the new law would make it illegal for merchants to sell extended warranties before telling customers what the manufacturer already offers for warranty protection. It would also put an end to expiry dates on prepaid cellphone gift cards. The minister said the bill, amending the province’s Consumer Protection Act, would correct an imbalance in an evolving industry. “In consumer protection you often have an imbalance that happens over time and in the whole field of telecommunications. There is not a jurisdiction in North America that hasn’t noticed this imbalance.” Michel Arnold, head of the non-profit consumer rights group Option consommateurs, said Quebec is the first jurisdiction in the country to introduce this kind of consumer protection. Weil said officials in the province receive nearly 700 formal complaints about cellphone contracts each year – about 10 per cent of all consumer complaints – as well as thousands of inquiries. Bill 60 is expected to be adopted before the end of the year.

and what about in the rest of Canada too? Bell Changing horses, making changes, additions to the contract in midstream is invalid, a breach, still not allowed, especially without the subsequent, and pre consent, approval of both parties now still too and is a breach of contract rather. That includes Bell capping of my bit torrent downloads too on my unlimited download account

Now in my decades of real life experiences in Canada the existing laws, regulating societies, governments clearly did not stop many Realtors, lawyers or even now Bell Sympatico from telling lies to the customers, others. http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/misapplications-of-the-laws-in-canada/

With Bell you have to check your actual delivered speeds , “internet download and upload speed test” cause Bell seems to change it to suit themselves.. (Presently I am with Acanac Inc. http://www.acanac.ca 1-866-281-3538, and do see their speed test too).

Now this mis-advertisement of the actual speeds attained also reflects the common problem we tend to have also in Canada with the false, misleading advertising, trade practices by Bell, Rogers, Videotron in regard to the speeds of their iphone and DSL, ADSL, cable internet services. These Communication, ISP firms amongst others are known to inflate, advertise substantially higher speeds than the consumer will actual get next get on the average, and the next related internet congestion cause web connectivity problems, and also reductions of the downloads speeds too.. Over 2M Canadians now have cable based phone. Most of those were former Bell Canada customers.

Bell itself found a an excuse for not performing a specific job assigned to them under the contract agreement but fooled few people in the process now too. One side breaching a contract is a common, often fact of life, very common, and it happens often in in the Computer business, with Internet Service Providers, in Real estate and even with new home contractors now as well sadly, and I have often witnessed it myself.. and pretentious self regulating boards, governments are mostly useless too, and it is basically too costly to get a lawyer, it only makes the lawyer’s richer, so now the best way to deal with any breach of contract is to expose the bad guys to all, to the news media and thus really put them out of business.. and I have done that even with major corporations successfully now too.. ”

Now what about having now the much need real consumer protections for the citizens of Canada here as well from the greedy, lying, no good corporations? The Liberals are just as bad as the Conservatives in not dealing in Canada with the lying, price gouging communication firms..

“Conservative government bows to the wishes of large corporations and ignore consumer protection.” ” Tony Clement, He is protecting the providers of these services, their monopoly and their profits. Never mind the Consumer whom the Office of Consumer Affairs was set up to help. ” ” government is pro-business. And no matter who we vote for, that will remain the same. How many of our government officials actually read our comments. One question, what does ‘lobbying’ actual entails?”

” Tony Clement ..no doubt the Minister’s seats at the Rogers Centre in Toronto and the Bell Centre in Montreal are assured.” ” Tony Clement is not for us. This fellow is definitely not a consumer advocate and to make it quite blunt – he is not for our welfare. We the people need a government which encourages completion and one which tries to hide the oligopolies which really don’t re-invest much into Canada, unlike the US. Perhaps a massive shakeup of our government infrastructure and the ministries is badly needed. We want a complete cleanup from top to bottom ” ” I think we need a complete public audit of exactly where all of our tax money is actually be spent!” http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/688547#

do see also
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/08/31/federal-consumer-protection-ha-ha-ha/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/buyer-beware-beware/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/consumers-affairs/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/phone-companies-internet-at-disadvantage/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/08/15/crtc-is-clearly-in-bells-bad-pocket/
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/why-many-businesses-fail
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/deceptive-unacceptable-unfair-business-trade-practices-unreliable-internet-access
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/class-action-suit-against-bell-sympatico
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/unfair
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/bell-internet
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/crtc-farcical-hearings-on-internet-speed-control
http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/bell-bce-sympatico
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/is-your-isp-still-even-watching-you
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/the-war-against-bell
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/bell-throttles-internet-speeds
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/and
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/consumers-affairs
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/bell-lied
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/i-cannot-trust-you-for-you-lie-to-me-all-the-time
https://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/basic-contract-law
http://witnessed.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/this-next-was-so-predictable-even-by-me-too

It has always confounded me as to why the liars, crooks, deceivers, abusers  too often do still do think they can get away with now, next and forever.
 
FOR WE TEND TO KNOW THAT THEY THE CROOKS, ABUSERS TOO,  NOW ARE NOT ABOUT TO STOP THEIR WRONG DOINGS. RATHER THEY WILL NEXT EVEN ESCALATE, CONTINUE IN THEM. AND THAT IS ANOTHER VALID REASON  THEY DO NEED TO BE EXPOSED, PROSECUTED AND STOPPED. EVEN FOR THE GOOD OF US ALL.
 

July 4, 2008

All good, decent people in Canada rather are clearly a threat

Filed under: News and politics — thenonconformer @ 4:59 pm
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
All good, decent people in Canada rather are clearly a threat to this Western Canadian Conservatives

Dion a threat to the West Calgary Herald,  Canada –  vain hope that they can turn those feelings into enough votes to dethrone Prime Minister Stephen Harper whenever he gets around to calling an election.
NDP prepares star candidate for Westmount
The Gazette (Montreal), Canada – 10 hours ago
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has until July 26 to set a date for the vote. It is widely expected to be held in September along with a second by-election in
 
All good, decent people in Canada rather are clearly a threat to the undeniable  too often self centered, greedy, immoral, abusive West meaning Alberta mostly..

I HAD  LIVED IN CALGARY FOR 15 YEARS AND WHEN I SAW FIRSTHAND WHAT ALBERTAN CONSERVATIVES WERE REALLY LIKE I RIGHTFULLY HAD TORN UP MY CONSERVATIVE SUPPORT CARD AND BECAME A LIBERAL RATHER.

Beware always of men and women, bullies, tormentors, control freaks,  persons, civil and public servants,  politicians, pastors, leaders, elders, who falsely do, will try to enslave you, oppress you, exploit you
 
Is 51:23 .. your tormentors {and} oppressors, those who said to you, Bow down, that we may ride {or} tread over you; and you have made your back like the ground and like the street for them to pass over.

 

 

http://postedat.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/how-many-rich-people-in-calgary-edmonton-alberta/

Verbal abuses.. Much too common these days

Filed under: Christianity,News and politics,Uncategorized — thenonconformer @ 3:43 pm
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Beware always of men and women, bullies, tormentors, control freaks,  persons, civil and public servants,  politicians, pastors, leaders, elders, who falsely do, will try to enslave you, oppress you, exploit you
 
Is 51:23 ..your tormentors {and} oppressors, those who said to you, Bow down, that we may ride {or} tread over you; and you have made your back like the ground and like the street for them to pass over.

(Prov 21:9 KJV)  It is better to dwell in a corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman in a wide house.

Bullies, abusers, liars, slanderers tend to be clearly immoral persons who try to enslave others uancceptably even if they profess to be Christian or what ever,,

>>My ex-husband smokes pot and drinks a lot, and I am told, so does his girlfriend. He once told me that I am too righteous because I don’t drink or do drugs, and I attend church.

and that was a verbal abuse if I have ever seen one..

so do thank God daily that he has now removed your from this  abusive relationship..

and do ask Him, God  to take all the tears away and he will.

(Psa 4:8 KJV)  I will both lay me down in peace, and sleep: for thou, LORD, only makest me dwell in safety.

(Rev 21:4 KJV)  And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

and there still can be a good life after divorce with God’s help…

Truly any type of abuse is unacceptable and anywhere too

and exposing it loudly in public as well as calling the police is the best way to deal with it for everyone’s benefit, the abuser included.

God himself clearly does not accept verbal, physical, or human rights abuses

(Mat 18:6 KJV) But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

(Mat 18:7 KJV) Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!

(Mat 18:8 KJV) Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire.

No we ALL cannot STOP, take the ostrich approach under the guise of love to the definite bad acts of others, we as Christians are still called to be fruit inspectors of those who profess to be Christians ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY RARELY QUOTE IT in actual context OR LIVE THE BIBLE THEY CLAIM THEY BELIEVE IN-

(Gen 31:42 KJV) Except the God of my father, the God of Abraham, and the fear of Isaac, had been with me, surely thou hadst sent me away now empty. God hath seen mine affliction and the labour of my hands, and rebuked thee yesternight.

(Lev 19:17 KJV) Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.

(Neh 5:7 KJV) Then I consulted with myself, and I rebuked the nobles, and the rulers, and said unto them, Ye exact usury, every one of his brother. And I set a great assembly against them.

(Psa 119:21 KJV) Thou hast rebuked the proud that are cursed, which do err from thy commandments.

(Prov 24:25 KJV) But to them that rebuke him shall be delight, and a good blessing shall come upon them.

(Prov 27:5 KJV) Open rebuke is better than secret love.

(Eccl 7:5 KJV) It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, than for a man to hear the song of fools.

(Mat 17:18 KJV) And Jesus rebuked the devil; and he departed out of him: and the child was cured from that very hour.

(Mark 1:25 KJV) And Jesus rebuked him, saying, Hold thy peace, and come out of him.

(Mark 4:39 KJV) And he arose, and rebuked the wind, and said unto the sea, Peace, be still. And the wind ceased, and there was a great calm.

(Mark 8:33 KJV) But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.

(1 Tim 5:20 KJV) Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

(2 Tim 4:2 KJV) Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.

(Titus 1:13 KJV) This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;

(Titus 2:15 KJV) These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.

(Heb 12:5 KJV) And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him:

(Rev 3:19 KJV) As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

“This is from the book by Patricia Evans http://andthenshecried.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/the-verbally-abusive-relationship-how-to-recognize-it-and-how-to-respond

Verbal abuse is a kind of battering which doesn’t leave evidence like physical abuse does. However, it can be just as painful, and recovery can take much longer. The victim of abuse lives in a gradually more confusing realm. In public she is with one man, in private he becomes another. Often, for the verbally abused woman (man), there is no witness to her reality and no one to understand her experiences. Friends and family continue to see her ex, the abuser, as a really good guy and, certainly, he agrees with them. The verbal abuser, while maintaining his charm with others, always takes his abuse behind closed doors. It is a means of holding power over his wife( husband) /partner.. Many women and some men leave a marriage and come back into the singles’ world with the diminished self-esteem that comes from a verbally abusive relationship. The fact that many of these women (men) have never even realized that they were being abused, makes it easy for them to enter another abusive relationship. A verbal abuser is an insecure person and immature person who is looking for power and control over another.In order to help you recognize abuse, remember that all forms of verbal abuse are methods of manipulating you for the purpose of establishing power over you. The following are some of the forms of verbal abuse the author helps you recognize.

  1. Withholding: a purposeful, silent treatment.
  2. Countering: a countering of your ideas, feelings, and perceptions, even going so far as to refute what he misconstrues you to have said.
  3. Discounting–a putdown of you or something you hold dear.
  4. Blocking and diverting–this is a sneaky, covert way of violating your dignity.
  5. Accusation and blame: generally involves lies about the partner’s intentions, attitudes, and motives. The author states that accusation and blame is present in all verbally abusive relationships.
  6. Judging and criticizing: lies about your personal qualities and performance.
  7. Trivializing and undermining: abusive behavior which makes light of your work, your efforts, your interests, or your concerns. The abuser attempts to dilute meaning and value in your life. Undermining might occur when your partner laughs at you, for example, when you burn yourself cooking. It is also jokes at your expense. Undermining is occurring when you feel a “so-called joke” is mean rather than funny.
  8. Name calling: no one has a right to call you degrading names. Name calling is verbal abuse.
  9. Ordering: Telling you to do something, rather than asking, or making decisions for you or for the two of you without your input.
  10. Forgetting and denial: the trickiest form of denial is forgetting. Become aware that forgetting is a form of denial that shifts all responsibility from the abuser to some “weakness of mind.”
  11. Abusive anger: this seems to be closely linked to the need to “blow up,” to dominate, to control, to go one up, and to put down. Any time you are snapped at or yelled at, you are being abused.
Threatening: Physical threats and sexual threats aside, verbal threats are an effort at manipulation. For example, a threat to leave, stay out all night, or take you home immediately is a manipulation for power. The threat of “pending disaster” is designed to shatter the partner’s serenity as well as her boundaries.

If you counter the abuser or attempt to explain yourself, you will probably be met with such statements as, “I don’t want to hear it, get out of my face” or “Woman you don’t have the brains“, “BYou shouldn’t have said that to me“.

If you are in a brand-new relationship and see warning signs of verbal abuse, the author suggests you might be wise to let the relationship go. It is not likely that a man (woman) who needs to dominate and control will change easily, if at all. It is also likely that when the newness of the relationship wears off, he will become more abusive. Verbal abuse can become physical in time and physical abuse is always preceded by verbal abuse, according to Evans.If you are in a long-term relationship, you can respond to the abuser as the book suggests and soon discover for yourself whether or not your mate is willing to change and stop his abusive behavior.

“If you have been verbally abused in your relationship, you may have discovered that explaining and trying to understand have not improved your relationship. Therefore, I recommend that you respond in a new way–a way that will make an emotional, psychological, and intellectual impact upon your mate.”

The abuser in your relationship may change when he finds that you do know when you are being abused, that you have set limits, that you mean what you say, and that you will not take behavior you don’t like. 

If the man ( or sadly too often now a women) in your relationship remains abusive, it is not only not your fault,” it is  your responsibility to deal with it, make it public, call the police too.

Any person cannot still fight with you of you leave his or her presences, even forever.. and there is still a good life after a failed marriage now too. I practise what I preach and often now too.

The first spouse, love seems  is always the best one in our false pride.. and I know what that is like too.. WE SEEM ALL TO REPEAT OUR BAD TASTE, VALUES.. When they let a person out a prison they generally have a rule not to let them return to his old environment, past home, for five years.. otherwise they will be under the same old bad habits, dispositions too..

NOTE I lost once everything I had owned.. still next I replaced it all with the same things, even though I never used most of them, old habits and bad tastes DO die hard still too for almost all of us.. 

Now still reporting publically the abusers, and calling the POLICE TOO most often solves the abuse problem the best.. for if the evil persons do not feel real negative personal consequences, REAL negative public exposures, they really have no reasons to change their bad habits next and likely then never will.

I rightfully too tend to openly expose all abusers, all bad people, all bad churches, all bad politicians, all bad corporations that I come across, and  often and I  also do do call the police, regulating authorities  often and demand they all be fired,   be put in jail too.

I was also still surprised how popular this post now is too.

http://thefocusonthefamily.wordpress.com/

July 3, 2008

US Judge Throws Users To The Wolves

Filed under: News and politics — thenonconformer @ 6:04 pm
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
To be fair the judge should first go after the major pornography watchers on the net, for what now the  Hollywood movie piracy is more of an immoral act over watching pornography? or will the judges do that next and get a list of the  porno users too? and what next? Home and more privacy invasions too!! Unbelieveable
….
Google forced to reveal users’ YouTube viewing habits
Times Online – 1 hour ago
Google has been ordered to hand over details of YouTube users’ viewing habits by a judge presiding over a copyright infringement case against the site.
Google Ordered to Hand Over All YouTube User Data FOXNews
Q&A: Divulging YouTube log BBC News
Washington PostIndependentguardian.co.ukPC Magazine
all 105 news articles » En Français »

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/03/AR2008070300747.html

Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.