The non conformer's Canadian Weblog

May 12, 2008

RCMP

Filed under: News and politics — thenonconformer @ 8:41 pm
Tags: , , ,
  0rcmp-regulation4
The RCMP did not catch it’s man yet. It still did not even get those people who murdered an unarmed  Polish Immigrant who also could not speak English  at the Vancouver airport this year. Rather the RCMP and Canada’s government has been clearly involved in false cover-ups, a false clear obstruction of justice,  cover-up   who is using tasers, and why and especially with the unarmed citizens now too.  Last November a Canadian Press analysis of 563 cases between 2002 and 2005 found three in four suspects Tasered by the RCMP were unarmed.  Several of those reports suggested a pattern of stun gun use as a convenient means of keeping drunk or rowdy people in line, rather than to defuse life-threatening clashes.  The Taser clearly has become an oppressive easy to use tool for the bad cops. Twenty people in Canada have died soon after being Tasered. and what again not one murdering cops falsely was punished too. Details of Dziekanski airport Tasering death were even wrongfully stripped from the RCMP report.
 
Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh, who was attorney general in British Columbia in 2000 when the first Tasers were introduced to Canadian police in Victoria, now the federal Liberal critic for the public safety ministry, said the assurances he was given about Taser’s safety, research record and amount of use all proved to be misleading. Dosanjh said he was assured in 2000 that the Taser was “absolutely safe,” had been “thoroughly researched” and would only be used sparingly. “In fact, what has happened has been contrary to all assurances I was given,” he said.  He said there has been significant “usage creep” and the Taser is now being used “where it was never intended to be used.”   ” he would like incorporated in the inquiry’s final report, including a re-positioning of Taser use “higher up on the use-of-force continuum.” National standards are needed across the country for its use and police and other users should have better training, he said.  Dosanjh was asked if he thought Tasers caused death.  “There is absolutely no conclusive evidence that Tasers don’t kill, Dosanjh said. “It’s not up to me . . . or the Canadian public to prove that Tasers kill. It is up to the Taser manufacturers and the police forces to actually satisfy Canadians that Tasers are not dangerous weapons.”
  
0sh-3

“CP OTTAWA – The RCMP call it Occurrence No. 2007-34748.  Millions of people around the world know it as the infamous Taser zapping at the Vancouver International Airport last October that sparked so many questions about Robert Dziekanski’s death.  The Mounties have stripped any new answers from a heavily censored report on the high-profile stun gun incident, obtained by The Canadian Press and CBC under the Access to Information Act.  Dziekanski died in the early hours of Oct. 14 after the RCMP hit the 40-year-old Polish immigrant with a Taser and pinned him to the airport floor. Police fired the electronic stun gun’s metal probes less than 30 seconds after arriving on the scene of a sweaty, agitated Dziekanski, who had earlier tossed a small table and computer monitor in frustration.  Opposition MPs and human rights groups have criticized the RCMP for suppressing details of Taser cases, including injuries suffered by people stunned and whether they were experiencing a mental health crisis at the time.  The national police force has gone even further with the Dziekanski report, deleting information it routinely releases in other cases.  Though Dziekanski’s name is struck from the four-page form, it is readily identifiable as his case, listing basic details well known to those who watched an amateur video of the RCMP arriving on the scene and shooting a Taser X26 at Dziekanski, who quickly crumpled in a heap.  Absent from the report is the name and rank of the officer who fired the Taser, the name of his supervisor, details about the duration of the firing, and the number of times the weapon was used in stun mode – a contact Tasering that’s akin to leaning on a hot stove.  A written summary of the incident has been blanked out along with assessments as to whether use of the Taser helped the RCMP either “avoid use of lethal force” or “avoid injuries to subject or Police.”  A passage about whether Dziekanski was armed or not has also been excised. One witness says he was waving a stapler at police.  New information is scant. The form says the RCMP officer issued the standard verbal command, “Police stop or you will be hit with 50,000 volts of electricity.” The lighting conditions are described as “Good artificial light.” And the serial number of the Taser was X00-2226496.  In a letter accompanying the form, the RCMP says it invoked exemptions under the Access to Information Act to protect the privacy of the person stunned and to guard confidences about the force’s investigations and weapons.  The RCMP did not return a phone call Sunday seeking comment on why it censored more information than usual. The deletions may, however, be due to the fact the Crown is still deciding whether to lay charges in the case following completion of a homicide probe.  Liberal public safety critic Ujjal Dosanjh said regardless of the investigation the RCMP should tell the public whether Dziekanski was armed and how many times he was hit with the Taser.  “I don’t see any reason why there should be an impediment to releasing information about how many times Mr. Dziekanski was stunned,” he said in an interview Sunday. “Why would that be a problem, unless that was a fact in dispute?”   Blistering newspaper editorials and opposition critics said Canadians were being asked to blindly trust the Mounties.  The force agreed to take a second look and last month released some additional details about Taser firings.  Last November a Canadian Press analysis of 563 cases between 2002 and 2005 found three in four suspects Tasered by the RCMP were unarmed.  Several of those reports suggested a pattern of stun gun use as a convenient means of keeping drunk or rowdy people in line, rather than to defuse life-threatening clashes.  Twenty people in Canada have died soon after being Tasered.  Manufacturer Taser International stresses that its device has never been directly blamed for a death, although it has been cited as a contributing factor in several cases.  “http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/080511/national/bc_taser_rcmp_dziekanski

can-parliament-ottawa-bad-smell

Politicians out of touch in Canada

Filed under: News and politics — thenonconformer @ 8:17 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,
  Bell Sympatico, Christian Missionary alliance, shit disease,
I am a prolific writer and I do write about important issues , important to many Canadians now to all as well..
 
According to the net statistics, definitely 3 issues of mine this week too  that are getting significant readings on the net and they are
1: My much too many Service, Billing Problems with Bell Sympatico, 
2 Stephen Harper’s  Christian Missionary alliance church being charged with theft, and Alcoholics in the government
3: The shit disease  fiasco..
etc.,
 
Yet only one of these above issues,  the shit disease  fiasco, has been even dealt with by the Canadian news media, for  the Bell Sympatico was only partially covered so far..
 
and none of these 3 issues have even been dealt fully adequately by our major politicians, the major political parties now too, and why is that?
What are politicians are out of touch with the citizens and do not care about those items the citizens care about ?  Unacceptable.

Bell Executive Care

Filed under: News and politics — thenonconformer @ 8:15 pm
Tags:
 
From: Paul kambulow
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:51 PM
Subject: Once again I got a phone call from Bell Sympatico accounting department today,
Attention: Bell executive Care, Bell billing- accounting,  and Bell’s Sasha Rollins- May 12 ,2008
 
For 5 weeks Bell Sympatico accounting has been bothering now  me to get paid some more for their poor  high speed internet services, but firstly for 18 months already I have been calling, writing to Bell Sympatico for them firstly to  to deal with their unacceptable, very inadequate High speed internet service. Only one person of many who said they will too, from Bell Sympatico  this year,  so far has even  kept his promise to call me back and to help resolve  some of my Bell Sympatico  Billing, or Bell Sympatico  Internet services technical problems, one Tech support from New Brunswick too, but no one else from Bell Sympatico  now wrongfully too  has called me back as promised about my contractual complaints to date this year too. Not even Bell’s executive care Sasha Rollins. Why is that?
 
Bell Sympatico still will not even give me as requested many time by me to them the signed copies of my monthly notices of the  last 6 months, or also a signed version of what my present contract now is too? Wow? And why is that?
 
Bell has phoned me recently 3 times for payment, to ask for more of my money, but Bell Sympatico  will deal with my many rightful complaints about Bell Sympatico’s still much to many, unacceptable contract breeches, Bell Sympatico’s  poor and inadequate internet services.   
 
So once again I got a phone call from the Bell Sympatico accounting department today, this afternoon May 12, 2008,  telling me that my internet account was outstanding and Bell Sympatico  asked me now how did I want to resolve it. I clearly  told Bell Sympatico  accounting now again that there couldn’t be any account withstanding cause for in December I had agreed with Bell Sympatico’s executive care, Sasha Rollins for a reliable, continual free 6 month 6 megs high speed unlimited  internet services, that I next still did not get even, as the rightfully payment for Bell Sympatico’s own past  false, misleading adds, and Bell’s failure to provide me such as reliable service  even before this for many years now too. Thus  the new Bell Sympatico agreement  should firstly last me now till the end of June 2008, and meanwhile Bell Sympatico  itself  had next in 2008 even breached that INTERNET SERVICE CONTRACT REVISION with me by Bell Sympatico  not not supplying me their  steady, reliable, continual INTERNET SERVICE but a problem plagued one that generally one works one week a month adequately, and my Bell Sympatico internet SERVICE was down even 5 days in the last two weeks, for which I have not received any credit yet as I have requested now many times too. Why is that too?  
 
And what about my rightful 55 dollar credit for the 2 wire modem upgrade I did not even request, that next also caused so many problems now too for me, and others?  And who was the Bell persons who falsely had in 2008 tried to make unrequested upgrades changes on my account without my approval, permission now too? Was he now rightfully  punished?  And what about my requested rightful payment for Bell’s additional contract breaches now as well, WHERE IS IT? **
 
On top of that Bell Sympatico  tech support in New Brunswick now has to get back also to me why the MS Vista Operating system and the Bell’s 2 wire modem still have major internet connectivity problems, as a result my  Bell Sympatico net being too often disconnected now as well.
 
Bell Sympatico’s Accounting Department had next agreed to me that the Bell Sympatico Billing matter should not be pursed any further by them, but Bell’s Executive Care Sasha Rollins who  was clearly in the middle of these problems, as he Sasha Rollins  also did not provide the proper information to the Bell accounting department, and Sasha Rollins should  he should handle my 280 written complaints now still to  Bell Sympatico. Bell Sympatico’s Sasha Rollins alone should clearly  deal adequately WITH MY MANY RIGHTFUL  COMPLAINTS  A LOT BETTER THAN HE HAS TO DATE AS WELL, EVEN IMMEDIATELY. And I had  agreed to this now. So who in Bell will insure that the Bell Sympatico’s  Customer help section does it Job for me now too? Who? Now one again in reality? Unacceptable.
 
RSVP ASAP Thank you.
 
Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street,  LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home  Tel 514-363-7316  KMM16616921V25471L0KM (KMM16681313V70004L0KM) 
 

What started as a simple phone call by me in January 2007 to Bell tech help line to determine why my internet services were so slow and sluggish next had  become a major farce, cover-up on the part of Bell Sympatico. I was next lied to for months as to the real reasons Bell they rather had offered me their poor internet services to me and  to many others in my city for years now too.. and then Bell had even  lied to me some more, had also breached their contractual obligations to me many times too, had allowed me even to be slandered, abused on the Bell customer forums now too.. and why? so  that clearly greedy Bell can continue stay in business to make more money..    

 

 

 

But the way the Bell customer support services tended to poorly handle my rightful complaints was ridiculous next as well. They had mislead me often as to what the real problem was, it was bad poor Bell itself, their inabilities  to meet theor own  promised contract terms. (Prov 27:2 KJV)  Let another man praise thee, and not thine own mouth; a stranger, and not thine own lips.
 
Bell Sympatico undeniably clearly had beforehand promised me verbally a “high speed unlimited, uncapped, reliable, continual download services,  and not they will try to next to  offer me this, submit  their best service but they had, have  to deliver to my next what was promised.  In reality they had clearly failed to live up to their own advertisement, promises because of their in incapableness now to do so to me and often as I had witnessed even for 24 months and rightfully detailed, had complained to them too.  Bell, their false pride of self importance has gone to their head and has allowed also the employees, even the president of Bell, vice president of Bell Sympatico to wrongfully now be abusive to  me ,  to wrongfully think that they can dictate their  own contract obligations, terms now to others, to wrongfully make their own self evaluations too, and that the others, like me, have no choice but to comply even to their clearly lies, distortions, perversities. The Bell president himself now also needs to be reminded that a contract is a joint agreement amongst two equal, mutually submissive  parties, and that both parties have to respect the contract agreement, and each other, meaning definitely that Bell has to respect the customer now too.. When this immoral Bell perverts now even writes to me and says according to our own records we have adequately supplied your our services, that is a disserted one sided fact, not necessarily or rightfully shared by the customer now, me. I have dealt with another ISP and they were more honest as to what they had promised me and next delivered in comparisons to Bell Sympatico  now too. The Bell competitors  download speeds are significantly higher all the time as well,  with no capping too  and even cheaper too.   

 

I have a civil engineering degree, Concordia University , Montreal 1968, and I had worked as a ReMax Realtor in Calgary too but in my decades of real life experiences in Canada the existing laws, regulating societies, governments clearly did not stop many Realtors,  lawyers or even now Bell Sympatico from telling lies to the customers, others.  http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/misapplications-of-the-laws-in-canada/
 
Imagine that Bell has been in Business for many years and is still guilty now clearly of misleading advertisements, fraudulent and unacceptable business practices, not living up to their contractual obligations, as I now have PERSONALLY WITNESSED, EXPERIENCED  and undeniably detailed to even Bell and many others many times too now . I Paid for a high speed unlimited download service but that is not what I got next. I got low internet speed at a high price. With Bell you have to check your actual delivered speeds , “internet download and upload speed test” cause Bell seems to change it to suit themselves..  (Presently I am with Acanac Inc. http://www.acanac.ca 1-866-281-3538, and do  see their speed test too).
** I was  once naive about Bell Sympatico. I had originally thought that when I had originally subscribed to Bell Sympatico’s High speed unlimited internet   services, that Bell next  could be trusted to keep their contractual obligations, but when time had started to pass, and I started in July 2007 to actually regularly  measure Bell Sympatico’s performances,  I had confirmed that Bell Sympatico undeniably,  clearly was not  keeping it’s promised,  contractual obligations, and next they still also had not done so as well. Next  Bell Sympatico  trough it’s many overall bad reps, support personnel continued to behave immorally in these matters by firstly, falsely not disclosing the full real reasons that  Bell now  had not been delivering their contractual, promises  to me and many others too now,    and Bell Sympatico  falsely continued also in even allowing all of the customers to be abused further by falsely implying the customer themselves were rather the ones now at fault originally now too in the reasons for Bell’s poor services and the  false Bell capping diversions reasons given out. In the last 16 months I too had witnessed and detailed that Bell Sympatico’s whole behavior and service performances   has been totally inacceptable. Cleary even Greedy Bell Sympatico  had wrongfully  gave even me a lot of grief, pain, problems, wasted my time the last 16 months too and Bell  they should now still even pay me more  for it too.    

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.